Comparative Analysis of Activation Functions in LSTM Models for Sentiment Classification

This study uses the IMDb movie review dataset to compare how well different deep learning architectures perform in sentiment classification.The experiments evaluate three sequential models, each enhanced with distinct configurations of activation functions and layer compositions.First Model utilizes ReLU and ELU activations within a bidirectional LSTM architecture, Second Model incorporates Tanh and SELU functions, while Third Model adopts a combination of Leaky ReLU and Tanh within a similar structural framework.To determine the effect of network architecture and activation function selection on classification effectiveness, each model is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and loss measures.Results indicate that the incorporation of advanced activations such as SELU and Leaky ReLU can lead to performance gains in certain metrics, with Third Model demonstrating improved generalization and lower loss compared to its predecessors.These results highlight how important activation functions are for improving deep learning models for tasks involving natural language processing.

Publication Details

Journal
IJARCCE
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17148/ijarcce.2025.14421
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Activation Functions in LSTM Models for Sentiment Classification

IJARCCE
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Comparative Analysis of Activation Functions in LSTM Models for Sentiment Classification

article en

Abstract

This study uses the IMDb movie review dataset to compare how well different deep learning architectures perform in sentiment classification.The experiments evaluate three sequential models, each enhanced with distinct configurations of activation functions and layer compositions.First Model utilizes ReLU and ELU activations within a bidirectional LSTM architecture, Second Model incorporates Tanh and SELU functions, while Third Model adopts a combination of Leaky ReLU and Tanh within a similar structural framework.To determine the effect of network architecture and activation function selection on classification effectiveness, each model is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and loss measures.Results indicate that the incorporation of advanced activations such as SELU and Leaky ReLU can lead to performance gains in certain metrics, with Third Model demonstrating improved generalization and lower loss compared to its predecessors.These results highlight how important activation functions are for improving deep learning models for tasks involving natural language processing.

IJARCCEVol. 14(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Activation Functions in LSTM Models for Sentiment Classification · IJARCCE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS