Sustainable development goal research in accounting: a systematic literature review and direction for future research

Purpose The recent rise in studies on non-financial disclosures, particularly those related to the sustainable development goals (SDGs), underscores the need for further investigation into the existing SDG literature. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current body of research on the SDGs. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopted the methodology outlined by Denyer and Tranfield (2009), which involves three key stages in conducting a review study: (i) planning the review, (ii) performing the review and (iii) reporting and dissemination. Their analysis covered 70 studies published in 24 high-ranking journals between 2018 and 2024. The review identified seven key themes in SDG research: (i) SDG practices, (ii) determinants of SDGs, (iii) socioeconomic implications of SDGs, (iv) compliance of SDGs with regulations, (v) proposed indices or models for SDGs, (vi) SDG disclosures and (vii) studies addressing SDGs 1 through 17. Findings The findings reveal notable knowledge gaps in the existing SDG literature, highlighting opportunities for future research. Notably, the analysis shows that most studies focus on developed countries and private sector organizations. Additionally, there has been a significant increase in SDG research during the final three years of the sample period (2022–2024). Practical implications Organizations should recognize that a commitment to SDG-related initiatives is instrumental in addressing societal challenges. Given that governments alone may not have the capacity to fully implement all 17 SDGs, the active participation of the private sector is essential. Originality/value This review presents valuable opportunities for accounting researchers to pursue future studies addressing the literature gaps identified. It offers critical insights that will benefit business executives, sustainability practitioners, governance and sustainability regulators, accounting standard-setters, private and public institutions, academics and researchers.