Biomass production, weed suppression, and soil water use of cover crops in dryland wheat production systems

Abstract Cover cropping in the fallow phase of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–fallow systems of the semiarid Pacific Northwest has been identified as an opportunity to build resilience and enhance farm profitability. Nine fall‐ and spring‐sown cover crops (CCs) grown during the traditional fallow period were evaluated at sites in the low and intermediate precipitation zones of the region in a 2‐year study (2021 and 2022). The fall‐sown CCs included winter pea ( Pisum sativum L.), winter lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.), and fall species mix; and the spring‐sown CCs included common vetch, yellow mustard, lacy phacelia, tillage radish ( Raphanus sativus L.), spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), and a spring species mix. CCs were evaluated for biomass production and impacts on soil water and weeds. CC growth was dependent on location, year, planting timing, and CC species. Fall‐sown CCs generally produced more biomass than spring‐sown CCs across site‐years, with winter peas and the fall species mix being most productive. Following a year of greater than average precipitation, no negative effects of CCs on fall soil moisture were observed at the intermediate precipitation site, while fall‐sown CCs reduced soil moisture at the low precipitation site. The suppressive effect of CCs on weeds ranged from null to moderate, depending on site, year, and CC seeding time. Fall‐sown CCs more consistently suppressed weeds than spring‐sown CCs. Additionally, fall‐sown CCs were terminated in the spring before weeds set viable seeds, saving a herbicide application and reducing herbicide pressure without exacerbating future weed issues. Overall, select fall‐sown CCs showed promise to enhance ecosystem services during the traditional fallow period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70053
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Bioenergy crop production and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomass production, weed suppression, and soil water use of cover crops in dryland wheat production systems

Nicole Durfee, Fernando H. Oreja, Catherine L. Reardon, Jennifer A. Gourlie et al.
4 citations
Agronomy Journal
Bioenergy crop production and management
7.61
article

Biomass production, weed suppression, and soil water use of cover crops in dryland wheat production systems

Nicole Durfee, Fernando H. Oreja, Catherine L. Reardon, Jennifer A. Gourlie, Larry Pritchett, Francisco J. Calderón, Rebecca J. McGee, Pete A. Berry, Curtis B. Adams, Stephen Machado, Christina H. Hagerty, Judit Barroso, Grayson F. Namdar, Surendra Singh, Linnea Kriete
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Cover cropping in the fallow phase of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–fallow systems of the semiarid Pacific Northwest has been identified as an opportunity to build resilience and enhance farm profitability. Nine fall‐ and spring‐sown cover crops (CCs) grown during the traditional fallow period were evaluated at sites in the low and intermediate precipitation zones of the region in a 2‐year study (2021 and 2022). The fall‐sown CCs included winter pea ( Pisum sativum L.), winter lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.), and fall species mix; and the spring‐sown CCs included common vetch, yellow mustard, lacy phacelia, tillage radish ( Raphanus sativus L.), spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), and a spring species mix. CCs were evaluated for biomass production and impacts on soil water and weeds. CC growth was dependent on location, year, planting timing, and CC species. Fall‐sown CCs generally produced more biomass than spring‐sown CCs across site‐years, with winter peas and the fall species mix being most productive. Following a year of greater than average precipitation, no negative effects of CCs on fall soil moisture were observed at the intermediate precipitation site, while fall‐sown CCs reduced soil moisture at the low precipitation site. The suppressive effect of CCs on weeds ranged from null to moderate, depending on site, year, and CC seeding time. Fall‐sown CCs more consistently suppressed weeds than spring‐sown CCs. Additionally, fall‐sown CCs were terminated in the spring before weeds set viable seeds, saving a herbicide application and reducing herbicide pressure without exacerbating future weed issues. Overall, select fall‐sown CCs showed promise to enhance ecosystem services during the traditional fallow period.

Agronomy JournalVol. 117(2)
Agricultural Research Service (US), Oregon State University (US), Washington State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Bioenergy crop production and management
7.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.