Reducing waste in parenteral nutrition: comparison of Surgical- and Standard-Aseptic Non-Touch Technique
The NHS accounts for approximately 4% of carbon emissions in England. Aseptic techniques are an area where the use of consumables, and subsequent waste, may be high. Traditionally, administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) has been performed using a so-called sterile technique. The aim of this study was to compare the volume of waste generated from a traditional 'sterile' technique (Surgical-Aseptic Non-Touch Technique (ANTT)), using sterile gloves and a dressing pack, and Standard-ANTT, using non-sterile gloves, a general aseptic field and a micro-critical aseptic field where necessary in the administration of PN. Two procedure trays were arranged representing consumable equipment used in each procedure. All items including packaging were weighed. Standard-ANTT demonstrated an estimated 52% reduction in waste and carbon emissions. There is a pressing need for nurses to review practice and consider where more sustainable choices can be made in the administration of PN.
Authors
- Jane Fletcher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-8278)
- Hardip Malhi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6505-8460)
Institutions
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of Nursing
- Published
- 2025-04-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0255
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.20