Reducing waste in parenteral nutrition: comparison of Surgical- and Standard-Aseptic Non-Touch Technique

The NHS accounts for approximately 4% of carbon emissions in England. Aseptic techniques are an area where the use of consumables, and subsequent waste, may be high. Traditionally, administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) has been performed using a so-called sterile technique. The aim of this study was to compare the volume of waste generated from a traditional 'sterile' technique (Surgical-Aseptic Non-Touch Technique (ANTT)), using sterile gloves and a dressing pack, and Standard-ANTT, using non-sterile gloves, a general aseptic field and a micro-critical aseptic field where necessary in the administration of PN. Two procedure trays were arranged representing consumable equipment used in each procedure. All items including packaging were weighed. Standard-ANTT demonstrated an estimated 52% reduction in waste and carbon emissions. There is a pressing need for nurses to review practice and consider where more sustainable choices can be made in the administration of PN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Nursing
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0255
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing waste in parenteral nutrition: comparison of Surgical- and Standard-Aseptic Non-Touch Technique

Jane Fletcher, Hardip Malhi
1 citations
British Journal of Nursing
Climate Change and Health Impacts
1.20
article

Reducing waste in parenteral nutrition: comparison of Surgical- and Standard-Aseptic Non-Touch Technique

Jane Fletcher, Hardip Malhi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The NHS accounts for approximately 4% of carbon emissions in England. Aseptic techniques are an area where the use of consumables, and subsequent waste, may be high. Traditionally, administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) has been performed using a so-called sterile technique. The aim of this study was to compare the volume of waste generated from a traditional 'sterile' technique (Surgical-Aseptic Non-Touch Technique (ANTT)), using sterile gloves and a dressing pack, and Standard-ANTT, using non-sterile gloves, a general aseptic field and a micro-critical aseptic field where necessary in the administration of PN. Two procedure trays were arranged representing consumable equipment used in each procedure. All items including packaging were weighed. Standard-ANTT demonstrated an estimated 52% reduction in waste and carbon emissions. There is a pressing need for nurses to review practice and consider where more sustainable choices can be made in the administration of PN.

British Journal of NursingVol. 34(8)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.