Campus Online Publications through the Eyes of Digitally Disadvantaged Students

This study explored the perceptions of digitally disadvantaged students toward The Blooms online publication and identified recommendations for improvement. It employed a mixed-methods descriptive research design, integrating quantitative data from closed-ended survey items and qualitative insights from open-ended responses. Specifically, the study sought to: (1) describe the demographic profile of student respondents; (2) assess their perceptions of the online publication in terms of usability, visual appeal, correctness, timeliness, and accessibility; and (3) identify suggestions to enhance the publication based on their feedback. A total of 265 students from the School of Arts and Sciences, Aklan State University–Banga Campus, were selected through stratified random sampling. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, and mean were used for quantitative data, while emergent themes were identified from qualitative responses. Findings revealed that The Blooms Publication was perceived as highly useful (x̄ = 4.6), timely (x̄ = 4.5), and accurate (x̄ = 4.5). It was considered visually appealing (x̄ = 4.4), yet accessibility remained a challenge (x̄ = 2.0) due to digital and connectivity limitations. Thematic analysis of student suggestions highlighted areas for content enrichment, interactivity, improved design, and enhanced communication and accessibility. The study concludes that while the online publication is well-received, targeted improvements, especially addressing accessibility and student engagement, are necessary to meet the needs of digitally disadvantaged learners.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.42242
Primary Topic
Web and Library Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Campus Online Publications through the Eyes of Digitally Disadvantaged Students

Ava Mae Magallanes, Ma. Annie Masigon, Jonell Gregorio
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Web and Library Services
article

Campus Online Publications through the Eyes of Digitally Disadvantaged Students

Ava Mae Magallanes, Ma. Annie Masigon, Jonell Gregorio
article en

Abstract

This study explored the perceptions of digitally disadvantaged students toward The Blooms online publication and identified recommendations for improvement. It employed a mixed-methods descriptive research design, integrating quantitative data from closed-ended survey items and qualitative insights from open-ended responses. Specifically, the study sought to: (1) describe the demographic profile of student respondents; (2) assess their perceptions of the online publication in terms of usability, visual appeal, correctness, timeliness, and accessibility; and (3) identify suggestions to enhance the publication based on their feedback. A total of 265 students from the School of Arts and Sciences, Aklan State University–Banga Campus, were selected through stratified random sampling. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, and mean were used for quantitative data, while emergent themes were identified from qualitative responses. Findings revealed that The Blooms Publication was perceived as highly useful (x̄ = 4.6), timely (x̄ = 4.5), and accurate (x̄ = 4.5). It was considered visually appealing (x̄ = 4.4), yet accessibility remained a challenge (x̄ = 2.0) due to digital and connectivity limitations. Thematic analysis of student suggestions highlighted areas for content enrichment, interactivity, improved design, and enhanced communication and accessibility. The study concludes that while the online publication is well-received, targeted improvements, especially addressing accessibility and student engagement, are necessary to meet the needs of digitally disadvantaged learners.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Web and Library Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.