The place of rhetoric in the process of interdisciplinary integration of sciences

INTRODUCTION . The question of the interdisciplinary connections of rhetoric nature is raised, since the ambiguity of its status also creates difficulties in establishing its links with other humanities. In this regard, the purpose of the research is to describe the forms of interdisciplinary connections typical for the modern humanitarian studies and clarify the place of rhetoric in this system. MATERIALS AND METHODS . The object of the research is the interdisciplinary connections of rhetoric with other humanitarian disciplines. For their comprehensive analysis, a set of complementary general scientific (abstraction, classification, systematization, interpretation, etc.) as well as philological (comparative analysis of the purpose of humanitarian disciplines, discourse analysis, etc.) methods are used. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . The forms of interdisciplinary rhetoric are analyzed. They are divided into constructive (when independent disciplines are combined to solve issues at the junction of sciences) and destructive (when there is a mechanical unification of fragments of different sciences). The first group includes: the formation of a new science at the junction of other sciences; the unification of two equal disciplines to serve a specific field of knowledge; the interaction of science and practice; the temporary unification of independent sciences to solve some complex problem; traditional forms of enriching sciences through the use of concepts, methods, etc. of other sciences. The second group includes interdisciplinary plagiarism: substitution of the content of rhetoric with fragments borrowed from other sciences; distribution of the content of rhetoric in other disciplines; unjustified expansion of the subject of science. CONCLUSION . The classification of interdisciplinary connections of rhetoric is generalized. The conclusion is made about its true place in the system of humanities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neophilology
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2025-11-1-160-171
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The place of rhetoric in the process of interdisciplinary integration of sciences

T. V. Anisimova
Neophilology
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

The place of rhetoric in the process of interdisciplinary integration of sciences

T. V. Anisimova
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION . The question of the interdisciplinary connections of rhetoric nature is raised, since the ambiguity of its status also creates difficulties in establishing its links with other humanities. In this regard, the purpose of the research is to describe the forms of interdisciplinary connections typical for the modern humanitarian studies and clarify the place of rhetoric in this system. MATERIALS AND METHODS . The object of the research is the interdisciplinary connections of rhetoric with other humanitarian disciplines. For their comprehensive analysis, a set of complementary general scientific (abstraction, classification, systematization, interpretation, etc.) as well as philological (comparative analysis of the purpose of humanitarian disciplines, discourse analysis, etc.) methods are used. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . The forms of interdisciplinary rhetoric are analyzed. They are divided into constructive (when independent disciplines are combined to solve issues at the junction of sciences) and destructive (when there is a mechanical unification of fragments of different sciences). The first group includes: the formation of a new science at the junction of other sciences; the unification of two equal disciplines to serve a specific field of knowledge; the interaction of science and practice; the temporary unification of independent sciences to solve some complex problem; traditional forms of enriching sciences through the use of concepts, methods, etc. of other sciences. The second group includes interdisciplinary plagiarism: substitution of the content of rhetoric with fragments borrowed from other sciences; distribution of the content of rhetoric in other disciplines; unjustified expansion of the subject of science. CONCLUSION . The classification of interdisciplinary connections of rhetoric is generalized. The conclusion is made about its true place in the system of humanities.

NeophilologyVol. 11(1)
St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The place of rhetoric in the process of interdisciplinary integration of sciences — T. V. Anisimova · Neophilology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS