INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN OF COMPETITION IN SOCIAL MARKETS

Today, competition is positioned as the main tool for increasing market efficiency, including in the social sphere. Annual monitoring of the state of competition is carried out across regions, roadmaps and target indicators are developed. The article analyzes the effectiveness of institutional design of competition in regional markets in the social sphere. Based on the example of indicators of population satisfaction with the level of prices and quality in the markets of regions, the absence of significant changes in the level of competition in them was demonstrated. A conclusion is made about a formal approach to the development of measures to develop competition. Based on the conducted research, recommendations are given for building models of service markets in the social sphere. The conditions for the institutional design of competition have been established: reducing the difference between service providers in the public and commercial sectors in the economic aspect, observing restrictions on the territorial criterion (development of competition in large cities and towns). Market segments in which it is advisable to introduce competition mechanisms are identified. In particular, in the medical services market, the greatest effect can be achieved by introducing competitive mechanisms in primary health care, and in the social services market - in the home care segment. Other segments of the mentioned markets have fairly high barriers to entry, primarily of an economic nature, so stimulating competition in them will be unjustifiably expensive. The markets for preschool education, additional education for children, children's recreation and health improvement do not have such restrictions. For the selected segments, recommendations were formulated for the development of competition in the markets for social services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Moscow University Bulletin Series 21 Public administration
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55959/msu2073-2643-21-2024-3-3-26
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN OF COMPETITION IN SOCIAL MARKETS

О.Ю. Горбова
1 citations
Moscow University Bulletin Series 21 Public administration
Economic Theory and Institutions
1.13
article

INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN OF COMPETITION IN SOCIAL MARKETS

О.Ю. Горбова
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Today, competition is positioned as the main tool for increasing market efficiency, including in the social sphere. Annual monitoring of the state of competition is carried out across regions, roadmaps and target indicators are developed. The article analyzes the effectiveness of institutional design of competition in regional markets in the social sphere. Based on the example of indicators of population satisfaction with the level of prices and quality in the markets of regions, the absence of significant changes in the level of competition in them was demonstrated. A conclusion is made about a formal approach to the development of measures to develop competition. Based on the conducted research, recommendations are given for building models of service markets in the social sphere. The conditions for the institutional design of competition have been established: reducing the difference between service providers in the public and commercial sectors in the economic aspect, observing restrictions on the territorial criterion (development of competition in large cities and towns). Market segments in which it is advisable to introduce competition mechanisms are identified. In particular, in the medical services market, the greatest effect can be achieved by introducing competitive mechanisms in primary health care, and in the social services market - in the home care segment. Other segments of the mentioned markets have fairly high barriers to entry, primarily of an economic nature, so stimulating competition in them will be unjustifiably expensive. The markets for preschool education, additional education for children, children's recreation and health improvement do not have such restrictions. For the selected segments, recommendations were formulated for the development of competition in the markets for social services.

Moscow University Bulletin Series 21 Public administrationVol. 21(№3, 2024)
Ryazan State Radio Engineering University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Economic Theory and Institutions
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.