Is Constructive Discharge a Metaphor for a “Boy Named Sue”? The Remedial Role of Psychological Safety When Leadership Is Toxic

This paper uses the metaphor of “A Boy Named Sue” to explore resilience and conflict resolution within the workplace, focusing on how toxic leaders sabotage employees. It delves into the practice of constructive discharge, where leaders, instead of directly addressing performance issues, create hostile environments, pushing employees to resign. We examine how leaders gatekeep and undermine employees’ inputs to induce resignations without explicit dismissal. The literature shows that toxic leaders sabotage environments, create ethical dilemmas, power imbalances, and organizational dysfunction. Our review of the literature provides methods to mitigate destructive leadership practices, helping managers use psychological safety measures to foster more inclusive and supportive workplace environments. We present six recommended corrective actions managers can take to reduce the harm caused by toxic leaders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Leadership Accountability and Ethics
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/jlae.v22i1.7604
Primary Topic
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Constructive Discharge a Metaphor for a “Boy Named Sue”? The Remedial Role of Psychological Safety When Leadership Is Toxic

Randolph Atkins, Reginald L. Bell, JoAnn Emale
Journal of Leadership Accountability and Ethics
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
article

Is Constructive Discharge a Metaphor for a “Boy Named Sue”? The Remedial Role of Psychological Safety When Leadership Is Toxic

Randolph Atkins, Reginald L. Bell, JoAnn Emale
article en

Abstract

This paper uses the metaphor of “A Boy Named Sue” to explore resilience and conflict resolution within the workplace, focusing on how toxic leaders sabotage employees. It delves into the practice of constructive discharge, where leaders, instead of directly addressing performance issues, create hostile environments, pushing employees to resign. We examine how leaders gatekeep and undermine employees’ inputs to induce resignations without explicit dismissal. The literature shows that toxic leaders sabotage environments, create ethical dilemmas, power imbalances, and organizational dysfunction. Our review of the literature provides methods to mitigate destructive leadership practices, helping managers use psychological safety measures to foster more inclusive and supportive workplace environments. We present six recommended corrective actions managers can take to reduce the harm caused by toxic leaders.

Journal of Leadership Accountability and EthicsVol. 22(1)
Prairie View A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.