Pengembangan snack bar berbasis pangan lokal: analisis gizi dan optimasi formulasi

Background: The development of nutritious snack bars is expected to provide a viable solution for offering popular snacks that meet the nutritional needs of adolescents. Therefore, the development of locally sourced snack bars like Puanchi Bar, which substitutes fish glue flour, becomes a promising solution to support government nutrition programs.Objectives: This study aims to analyze the nutritional content and formulation accuracy of three snack bar formulations. Methods: The research design used in this study is a laboratory experimental design with proximate tests, including analysis of protein content, fat content, moisture content, ash content, and carbohydrate content. The study was conducted from May to November 2023 in three laboratories, using three snack bar formulations: F3, F6, and F9. This research utilizes both secondary and primary data. Secondary data was obtained from previous studies, while primary data was obtained through laboratory testing. The data were analyzed using ANOVA, Duncan, and Kruskal-Wallis testsResults: The results showed that formulation F9 has the highest overall nutritional content, particularly in protein and minerals, with an average protein content of 5,10%, ash content of 2,48%, and moisture content of 5,66%, which are higher than F3 and F6. Meanwhile, formulations F3 and F6 excel in carbohydrate and fat content, with F3 and F6 having carbohydrate levels of 64,52% and 64,73%, respectively. The fat content of F3 and F6 is 27,8% and 24,5%, respectively. Formulation F9 is considered more suitable for fulfilling protein and mineral needs, but attention must be given to its moisture content, which could affect shelf life. On the other hand, F3 and F6 are superior in taste and energy but require adjustments to their fat content to maintain a balanced nutritional profile.Conclusion: Formulation F9 is more suitable for meeting protein and mineral needs, while F3 and F6 are better for providing energy and preferred taste. Each formulation has different potential depending on specific nutritional requirements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal SAGO Gizi dan Kesehatan
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30867/gikes.v6i1.2201
Primary Topic
Food and Agricultural Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pengembangan snack bar berbasis pangan lokal: analisis gizi dan optimasi formulasi

Ditia Fitri Arinda, Indah Purnama Sari, Windi Indah Fajar Ningsih
Jurnal SAGO Gizi dan Kesehatan
Food and Agricultural Sciences
article

Pengembangan snack bar berbasis pangan lokal: analisis gizi dan optimasi formulasi

Ditia Fitri Arinda, Indah Purnama Sari, Windi Indah Fajar Ningsih
article en

Abstract

Background: The development of nutritious snack bars is expected to provide a viable solution for offering popular snacks that meet the nutritional needs of adolescents. Therefore, the development of locally sourced snack bars like Puanchi Bar, which substitutes fish glue flour, becomes a promising solution to support government nutrition programs.Objectives: This study aims to analyze the nutritional content and formulation accuracy of three snack bar formulations. Methods: The research design used in this study is a laboratory experimental design with proximate tests, including analysis of protein content, fat content, moisture content, ash content, and carbohydrate content. The study was conducted from May to November 2023 in three laboratories, using three snack bar formulations: F3, F6, and F9. This research utilizes both secondary and primary data. Secondary data was obtained from previous studies, while primary data was obtained through laboratory testing. The data were analyzed using ANOVA, Duncan, and Kruskal-Wallis testsResults: The results showed that formulation F9 has the highest overall nutritional content, particularly in protein and minerals, with an average protein content of 5,10%, ash content of 2,48%, and moisture content of 5,66%, which are higher than F3 and F6. Meanwhile, formulations F3 and F6 excel in carbohydrate and fat content, with F3 and F6 having carbohydrate levels of 64,52% and 64,73%, respectively. The fat content of F3 and F6 is 27,8% and 24,5%, respectively. Formulation F9 is considered more suitable for fulfilling protein and mineral needs, but attention must be given to its moisture content, which could affect shelf life. On the other hand, F3 and F6 are superior in taste and energy but require adjustments to their fat content to maintain a balanced nutritional profile.Conclusion: Formulation F9 is more suitable for meeting protein and mineral needs, while F3 and F6 are better for providing energy and preferred taste. Each formulation has different potential depending on specific nutritional requirements.

Jurnal SAGO Gizi dan KesehatanVol. 6(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Food and Agricultural Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pengembangan snack bar berbasis pangan lokal: analisis gizi dan optimasi formulasi — Ditia Fitri Arinda, Indah Purnama Sari, et al. · Jurnal SAGO Gizi dan Kesehatan (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS