Multivalent evaluation of digital preservation success

Purpose Current assessment practice for digital preservation focuses on instrumental trustworthiness of processes, systems and outputs, with insufficient regard for teleological success of resulting programmatic outcomes. This paper provides a communicological formalization of digital preservation success. Design/methodology/approach Digital preservation is repositioned as semiotic sense-making unfolding across archival timespans and accompanying cultural as well as technical distance, and not just as persistent data management. Findings Inherent intersubjective contingency of any use of preserved information objects necessitates multivalent consideration of various communicative qualities, experiential affordances and artifactual characteristics for the comprehensive determination of preservation success. Research limitations/implications The proposed conceptual framework provides a foundation for subsequent development of evaluative best practice recommendations. Originality/value While digital preservation concerns span a socio-technic continuum, evaluative practice should properly emphasize the embodied experience of preservation-enabled communication. Communicological framing of preservation assessment complements the predictive reliability of programmatic trustworthiness with confirmatory assurance of experiential efficacy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Documentation
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-12-2024-0313
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multivalent evaluation of digital preservation success

Stephen L. Abrams
Journal of Documentation
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

Multivalent evaluation of digital preservation success

Stephen L. Abrams
article en

Abstract

Purpose Current assessment practice for digital preservation focuses on instrumental trustworthiness of processes, systems and outputs, with insufficient regard for teleological success of resulting programmatic outcomes. This paper provides a communicological formalization of digital preservation success. Design/methodology/approach Digital preservation is repositioned as semiotic sense-making unfolding across archival timespans and accompanying cultural as well as technical distance, and not just as persistent data management. Findings Inherent intersubjective contingency of any use of preserved information objects necessitates multivalent consideration of various communicative qualities, experiential affordances and artifactual characteristics for the comprehensive determination of preservation success. Research limitations/implications The proposed conceptual framework provides a foundation for subsequent development of evaluative best practice recommendations. Originality/value While digital preservation concerns span a socio-technic continuum, evaluative practice should properly emphasize the embodied experience of preservation-enabled communication. Communicological framing of preservation assessment complements the predictive reliability of programmatic trustworthiness with confirmatory assurance of experiential efficacy.

Journal of DocumentationVol. 81(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.