Comparison of matching the compound or elements as a differential problem‐solving response

Differential observing responses (DORs) are additional response requirements used to promote orientation to a stimulus in a discrimination task. Farber and Dickson (2023) recently provided a DOR taxonomy, and these authors reported that no prior research has compared the effects of distinct DOR requirements. We compared the effects of two DOR requirements on textual responding by five children exhibiting reading deficits. Participants read a daily word list and were required to emit DORs that involved matching the compound or individual elements of the target stimulus. When a word was unknown, emitting the condition-specific DOR resulted in a tablet-produced echoic prompt. The DOR that required matching of the individual elements met the acquisition criterion in the fewest days for four participants but was not preferred by any participant. Implications for DORs in a problem-solving paradigm and conditions contributing to their efficacy are considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.70011
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of matching the compound or elements as a differential problem‐solving response

Tom Cariveau, Alexandria Brown, Katherine E. Miller, Taylor K. Lewis
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Comparison of matching the compound or elements as a differential problem‐solving response

Tom Cariveau, Alexandria Brown, Katherine E. Miller, Taylor K. Lewis
article en

Abstract

Differential observing responses (DORs) are additional response requirements used to promote orientation to a stimulus in a discrimination task. Farber and Dickson (2023) recently provided a DOR taxonomy, and these authors reported that no prior research has compared the effects of distinct DOR requirements. We compared the effects of two DOR requirements on textual responding by five children exhibiting reading deficits. Participants read a daily word list and were required to emit DORs that involved matching the compound or individual elements of the target stimulus. When a word was unknown, emitting the condition-specific DOR resulted in a tablet-produced echoic prompt. The DOR that required matching of the individual elements met the acquisition criterion in the fewest days for four participants but was not preferred by any participant. Implications for DORs in a problem-solving paradigm and conditions contributing to their efficacy are considered.

Journal of Applied Behavior AnalysisVol. 58(3)
University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of matching the compound or elements as a differential problem‐solving response — Tom Cariveau, Alexandria Brown, et al. · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS