Enhancing Dual-Loop Pressure Control in Pneumatic Soft Robotics With a Comparison of Evolutionary Algorithms for PID & FOPID Controller Tuning

The control of pneumatic soft robotics is challenging due to nonlinearites arising from many factors including pneumatic system components and material properties of the soft actuator. Manual methods for PID controller tuning are inadequate for the nonlinear and time-variant dynamics present in soft robotics. Affordable pneumatic components such as on/off valves cause discontinuities in flow rate, introducing nonlinearities and oscillatory fluctuations into the system. This study proposes a dual-loop control system: one for PID and Fractional-Order PID (FOPID) control of a solenoid valve that feeds air into the actuator, and another for PID control of the pump upstream of the valve. The PID and FOPD parameters are optimized using evolutionary algorithms: Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Simulated Annealing (SA). Simulations and real-world experiments are conducted to validate the optimized parameters. Our results demonstrate that the dual-loop hardware configuration reduces fluctuations from the valves compared with a single-loop control scheme. The experimental statistical analysis confirms that FOPID achieves the highest significant improvements in rise time (PSO) and peak time (GA, PSO), while PID performs better for overshoot (GA, PSO). These findings highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate optimization algorithm based on the specific control objective, as FOPID does not outperform PID in every metric across all methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2025.3563163
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soft Robotics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Dual-Loop Pressure Control in Pneumatic Soft Robotics With a Comparison of Evolutionary Algorithms for PID & FOPID Controller Tuning

J. Libby
5 citations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Soft Robotics and Applications
3.37
article

Enhancing Dual-Loop Pressure Control in Pneumatic Soft Robotics With a Comparison of Evolutionary Algorithms for PID & FOPID Controller Tuning

J. Libby
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The control of pneumatic soft robotics is challenging due to nonlinearites arising from many factors including pneumatic system components and material properties of the soft actuator. Manual methods for PID controller tuning are inadequate for the nonlinear and time-variant dynamics present in soft robotics. Affordable pneumatic components such as on/off valves cause discontinuities in flow rate, introducing nonlinearities and oscillatory fluctuations into the system. This study proposes a dual-loop control system: one for PID and Fractional-Order PID (FOPID) control of a solenoid valve that feeds air into the actuator, and another for PID control of the pump upstream of the valve. The PID and FOPD parameters are optimized using evolutionary algorithms: Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Simulated Annealing (SA). Simulations and real-world experiments are conducted to validate the optimized parameters. Our results demonstrate that the dual-loop hardware configuration reduces fluctuations from the valves compared with a single-loop control scheme. The experimental statistical analysis confirms that FOPID achieves the highest significant improvements in rise time (PSO) and peak time (GA, PSO), while PID performs better for overshoot (GA, PSO). These findings highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate optimization algorithm based on the specific control objective, as FOPID does not outperform PID in every metric across all methods.

IEEE Robotics and Automation LettersVol. 10(6)
Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Soft Robotics and Applications
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.