Recognizing Special Art Pieces Through EEG: A Journey in Neuroaesthetics Classification

This paper describes three methods for analyzing electroencephalography (EEG) signals to classify users’ brain responses to exposure to art. The first two methods exploit classical machine learning approaches based on various sets of features extracted using different techniques for EEG analysis. In particular, the first method analyzes features extracted from time and frequency domains using an ensemble classifier, while the second one analyzes the Phase Locking Values of different channels using a classifier based on K-Nearest Neighbors. The third method retrains a well-known Convolutional Neural Network, namely VGG16, for image classification to analyze the scalograms obtained by applying the continuous wavelet transform to the EEG. These methods are evaluated employing a public dataset collected using mobile tools from museum visitors at an art exhibit. The dataset suffers from the problem of unbalanced classes, and this work also evaluates the impact of mitigation actions. The results reveal a significant difference between models tailored to the subject being tested, that achieve up to 95.43% of accuracy, and those trained without data from that subject (leave-one-subject-out strategy), that achieve up to 65.35% of accuracy. This suggests that, at this stage, customized approaches are more appropriate for the neuroaesthetics field, whereas models with general applicability need further development. We also conducted an analysis to assess whether age influenced the performance of the models.We split the visitors into three groups based on their age: adolescents, young adults, and adults. The analysis performed with a leave-one-subject-out strategy revealed higher accuracy for adolescents (73.21%) and adults (66.98%) than young adults (60%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3562908
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognizing Special Art Pieces Through EEG: A Journey in Neuroaesthetics Classification

Marco Avvenuti, Francesco Marcelloni, Alessio Vecchio, Maurizio Palmieri
1 citations
IEEE Access
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
1.43
article

Recognizing Special Art Pieces Through EEG: A Journey in Neuroaesthetics Classification

Marco Avvenuti, Francesco Marcelloni, Alessio Vecchio, Maurizio Palmieri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper describes three methods for analyzing electroencephalography (EEG) signals to classify users’ brain responses to exposure to art. The first two methods exploit classical machine learning approaches based on various sets of features extracted using different techniques for EEG analysis. In particular, the first method analyzes features extracted from time and frequency domains using an ensemble classifier, while the second one analyzes the Phase Locking Values of different channels using a classifier based on K-Nearest Neighbors. The third method retrains a well-known Convolutional Neural Network, namely VGG16, for image classification to analyze the scalograms obtained by applying the continuous wavelet transform to the EEG. These methods are evaluated employing a public dataset collected using mobile tools from museum visitors at an art exhibit. The dataset suffers from the problem of unbalanced classes, and this work also evaluates the impact of mitigation actions. The results reveal a significant difference between models tailored to the subject being tested, that achieve up to 95.43% of accuracy, and those trained without data from that subject (leave-one-subject-out strategy), that achieve up to 65.35% of accuracy. This suggests that, at this stage, customized approaches are more appropriate for the neuroaesthetics field, whereas models with general applicability need further development. We also conducted an analysis to assess whether age influenced the performance of the models.We split the visitors into three groups based on their age: adolescents, young adults, and adults. The analysis performed with a leave-one-subject-out strategy revealed higher accuracy for adolescents (73.21%) and adults (66.98%) than young adults (60%).

IEEE AccessVol. 13
University of Pisa (IT)
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.