Prediction of assistance dog training outcomes using machine learning and deep learning models

This study investigates the predictive power of machine learning and deep learning models for forecasting training outcomes in assistance dogs, using behavioral survey data (C-BARQ) collected from volunteer puppy-raisers at two developmental stages: 6 months and 12 months. We used data from two assistance dog training organizations–Canine Companions and The Seeing Eye, Inc.– to assess model performance and generalizability across different training contexts. Six models, including traditional machine learning approaches (SVM, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and XGBoost) and deep learning architectures (MLP and CNN), were trained and evaluated on C-BARQ behavioral scores using metrics such as accuracy, F1 Score, precision, and recall. Results indicate that Support Vector Machine (SVM) and XGBoost consistently delivered the highest prediction accuracy, with SVM achieving up to 80 % accuracy in the Canine Companions dataset and 71 % in the Seeing Eye dataset. Although deep learning models like CNN showed moderate accuracy, traditional machine learning models excelled, particularly in structured, tabular data where feature separability is essential. Models trained on 12-month data generally yielded higher predictive accuracy than those trained on 6-month data, highlighting the value of extended behavioral observations. This research underscores the efficacy of traditional machine learning models for early-phase prediction and emphasizes the importance of aligning model selection with dataset characteristics and the stage of behavioral assessment. • Various AI models were used to predict training outcomes in young assistance dogs. • Analyses were based on 6- and 12-month C-BARQ evaluations by volunteer puppy raisers. • One model achieved up to 80 % prediction accuracy using 12-month C-BARQ scores. • Predictions based on 6-month C-BARQ assessments were less accurate for all models. • Results highlight the potential value of AI for predicting future success in working dogs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106632
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of assistance dog training outcomes using machine learning and deep learning models

Kathleen Freeberg, Brenda S. Kennedy, Mohammad Hossein Amirhosseini, Emily E. Bray et al.
5 citations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
9.09
article

Prediction of assistance dog training outcomes using machine learning and deep learning models

Kathleen Freeberg, Brenda S. Kennedy, Mohammad Hossein Amirhosseini, Emily E. Bray, Katy M. Evans, James A. Serpell, Piya Pettigrew, Theadora A. Block, Laura E.L.C. Douglas
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the predictive power of machine learning and deep learning models for forecasting training outcomes in assistance dogs, using behavioral survey data (C-BARQ) collected from volunteer puppy-raisers at two developmental stages: 6 months and 12 months. We used data from two assistance dog training organizations–Canine Companions and The Seeing Eye, Inc.– to assess model performance and generalizability across different training contexts. Six models, including traditional machine learning approaches (SVM, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and XGBoost) and deep learning architectures (MLP and CNN), were trained and evaluated on C-BARQ behavioral scores using metrics such as accuracy, F1 Score, precision, and recall. Results indicate that Support Vector Machine (SVM) and XGBoost consistently delivered the highest prediction accuracy, with SVM achieving up to 80 % accuracy in the Canine Companions dataset and 71 % in the Seeing Eye dataset. Although deep learning models like CNN showed moderate accuracy, traditional machine learning models excelled, particularly in structured, tabular data where feature separability is essential. Models trained on 12-month data generally yielded higher predictive accuracy than those trained on 6-month data, highlighting the value of extended behavioral observations. This research underscores the efficacy of traditional machine learning models for early-phase prediction and emphasizes the importance of aligning model selection with dataset characteristics and the stage of behavioral assessment. • Various AI models were used to predict training outcomes in young assistance dogs. • Analyses were based on 6- and 12-month C-BARQ evaluations by volunteer puppy raisers. • One model achieved up to 80 % prediction accuracy using 12-month C-BARQ scores. • Predictions based on 6-month C-BARQ assessments were less accurate for all models. • Results highlight the potential value of AI for predicting future success in working dogs.

Applied Animal Behaviour ScienceVol. 287
University of Arizona (US), University of Nottingham (GB), University of East London (GB), Canine Companions for Independence (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
9.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.