Real-time Detection of Foodborne Pathogens and Biofilm in the Food Processing Environment with Bactiscan, A Macro-scale Fluorescence Device

Food safety relies on rapid detection methods and rigorous sampling of the food processing environment and is challenged by recurrent biofilm contamination and by sublethally injured bacteria that can evade detection. Bactiscan is investigated as an alternative detection approach, a macro-scale and reagentless device that detects microbial contamination through activating the green fluorescence of glycoproteins in the bacterial cell wall. The detection capability of Bactiscan was tested on foodborne pathogens Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, and Staphylococcus aureus. Detection by Bactiscan was assessed using 3 independent observers viewing bacterial samples dried on stainless steel, using 3 biological repeats and 5 technical repeats. Detection by Bactiscan was possible to 1.20 * 10<sup>6</sup> colony forming units (CFU), compared to 1.36 * 10<sup>4</sup> CFU by ATP swab testing, where Bactiscan detection limits were defined by the concentration at which 50% of the samples were observed under illumination of the device. Heat-killed and chlorine-stressed E. coli and S. enterica caused a 2-log reduction in detection by ATP swab tests (p ≤ 0.05), while detection by Bactiscan was unaffected (p ≥ 0.05). Pathogen biofilms were detectable via Bactiscan with >80% accuracy at 4 days of growth; E. coli and L. monocytogenes biofilms were visible at 2 days of growth. In situ contamination studies determined that Bactiscan can detect microbial contamination on chicken, salmon, and yoghurt samples with stronger fluorescence than a competitor's UV torch. The presence of one of the pathogens on the food samples was confirmed by metagenome sequencing, determining that S. aureus was present in 7 samples out of 9 with a relative abundance of >0.5%. These data demonstrate that Bactiscan can effectively detect bacteria present in the food processing environment and can complement existing technologies to improve food industry cleaning practices and infection prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Protection
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100511
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-time Detection of Foodborne Pathogens and Biofilm in the Food Processing Environment with Bactiscan, A Macro-scale Fluorescence Device

Joshua F. Robinson, Jeremy S. Webb, Callum Highmore, Joe Parker et al.
1 citations
Journal of Food Protection
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
0.67
article

Real-time Detection of Foodborne Pathogens and Biofilm in the Food Processing Environment with Bactiscan, A Macro-scale Fluorescence Device

Joshua F. Robinson, Jeremy S. Webb, Callum Highmore, Joe Parker, K Cooper, Roberto Castangia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Food safety relies on rapid detection methods and rigorous sampling of the food processing environment and is challenged by recurrent biofilm contamination and by sublethally injured bacteria that can evade detection. Bactiscan is investigated as an alternative detection approach, a macro-scale and reagentless device that detects microbial contamination through activating the green fluorescence of glycoproteins in the bacterial cell wall. The detection capability of Bactiscan was tested on foodborne pathogens Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, and Staphylococcus aureus. Detection by Bactiscan was assessed using 3 independent observers viewing bacterial samples dried on stainless steel, using 3 biological repeats and 5 technical repeats. Detection by Bactiscan was possible to 1.20 * 10<sup>6</sup> colony forming units (CFU), compared to 1.36 * 10<sup>4</sup> CFU by ATP swab testing, where Bactiscan detection limits were defined by the concentration at which 50% of the samples were observed under illumination of the device. Heat-killed and chlorine-stressed E. coli and S. enterica caused a 2-log reduction in detection by ATP swab tests (p ≤ 0.05), while detection by Bactiscan was unaffected (p ≥ 0.05). Pathogen biofilms were detectable via Bactiscan with >80% accuracy at 4 days of growth; E. coli and L. monocytogenes biofilms were visible at 2 days of growth. In situ contamination studies determined that Bactiscan can detect microbial contamination on chicken, salmon, and yoghurt samples with stronger fluorescence than a competitor's UV torch. The presence of one of the pathogens on the food samples was confirmed by metagenome sequencing, determining that S. aureus was present in 7 samples out of 9 with a relative abundance of >0.5%. These data demonstrate that Bactiscan can effectively detect bacteria present in the food processing environment and can complement existing technologies to improve food industry cleaning practices and infection prevention.

Journal of Food ProtectionVol. 88(6)
Biopharma Technology (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.