Procedurally Fair Co-Determination with Endogeneous Value Uncertainty: An Experiment

We present an experimental test of a procedurally fair co-determination mechanism where group members reduce their value uncertainty before submitting bids for a joint project. The results suggest a relatively efficient mechanism, with unprofitable projects being largely rejected and profitable ones accepted. Repeated interactions tended to enhance the efficiency, while uncertain information reduced it. The subjects invested surprisingly little search effort to reduce the uncertainty about the costs and benefits, and appeared to trade off search costs against higher bids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Games
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/g16020019
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procedurally Fair Co-Determination with Endogeneous Value Uncertainty: An Experiment

Sotiria Xanalatou, Werner Güth, Tibor Neugebauer, Ludivine Martin
Games
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Procedurally Fair Co-Determination with Endogeneous Value Uncertainty: An Experiment

Sotiria Xanalatou, Werner Güth, Tibor Neugebauer, Ludivine Martin
article en

Abstract

We present an experimental test of a procedurally fair co-determination mechanism where group members reduce their value uncertainty before submitting bids for a joint project. The results suggest a relatively efficient mechanism, with unprofitable projects being largely rejected and profitable ones accepted. Repeated interactions tended to enhance the efficiency, while uncertain information reduced it. The subjects invested surprisingly little search effort to reduce the uncertainty about the costs and benefits, and appeared to trade off search costs against higher bids.

GamesVol. 16(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Luxembourg (LU), IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE), Centre de Recherche en Économie et Management (FR), Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics (DE), Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LU), Université de Rennes (FR)
Partnerships for the goals, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.