What is It?

Using data pertaining to pronominal usages from Chinese, French, German and other languages, I argue that the dummy subject or the expletive pronoun it and the third-person singular pronoun it are actually the same syntactic placeholder in English. They are not accidental homonyms. Instead, they both function as expletives to satisfy the Extended Projection Principle, ban against null non-generic objects, and the Animacy Hierarchy. I also propose that the English gender-neutral inanimate pronoun it is highly marked cross-linguistically, as a result of English being one of the minority non-pro-drop languages while having impoverished gender-marking features that are confined only to its pronoun system. I hypothesize that no language has exclusive pronouns reserved only for referring to entities of low animacy. Lastly, I demonstrate that Chinese is not a radical or perfect pro-drop language, as many linguists have proposed. If expletive objects that are required in the disposal ba-structure are taken into consideration, Chinese needs dummy objects even at the cost of violating the Animacy Hierarchy. I categorize such object expletive pronouns as weak pronouns, similar to the it in the English extrapositional structure, e.g., it is nice to sing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Universal Language
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2025.26.1.101
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is It?

Haiyong Liu
Journal of Universal Language
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

What is It?

Haiyong Liu
article en

Abstract

Using data pertaining to pronominal usages from Chinese, French, German and other languages, I argue that the dummy subject or the expletive pronoun it and the third-person singular pronoun it are actually the same syntactic placeholder in English. They are not accidental homonyms. Instead, they both function as expletives to satisfy the Extended Projection Principle, ban against null non-generic objects, and the Animacy Hierarchy. I also propose that the English gender-neutral inanimate pronoun it is highly marked cross-linguistically, as a result of English being one of the minority non-pro-drop languages while having impoverished gender-marking features that are confined only to its pronoun system. I hypothesize that no language has exclusive pronouns reserved only for referring to entities of low animacy. Lastly, I demonstrate that Chinese is not a radical or perfect pro-drop language, as many linguists have proposed. If expletive objects that are required in the disposal ba-structure are taken into consideration, Chinese needs dummy objects even at the cost of violating the Animacy Hierarchy. I categorize such object expletive pronouns as weak pronouns, similar to the it in the English extrapositional structure, e.g., it is nice to sing.

Journal of Universal LanguageVol. 26(1)
Wayne State College (US), Wayne State University (US), State Classical Academy named after Maimonides (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What is It? — Haiyong Liu · Journal of Universal Language (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS