Dialektika Maddah Dalam Bencana Alam Gorontalo

This qualitative research seeks to examine the relation and implicaton of maddah (da’wah teaching materials) to discover new understandings of Islamic teachings especially on the issues of natural disaster occured in Gorontalo. Data were collected through observation and in-depth interviews to the preachers, natural disaster victims, and the members of Indonesian Ulema Council of Gorontalo (MUI). This research reveals that there ara at least two main argument of maddah in responding natural disasters. In the first stream, there is maddah that focuses on how natural disaster should be coped with human repentances to the God due to their exploitative actions toward the natural balances; while on the other hand, a madah that moves beyond boundaries of doctrines and ask for direct actions to save the earth. Built on the scholarship of dialectical framework, this paper argues that the difference between maddah teachings can be explained by contextualizing the issues of natural disaster through three primary principles: akidah, sharia and akhlaq. In praxis, this maddah’s vision then manifests in the spirit of natural disaster advocacy such as mutual aid, climate awareness and justice, caring and other collective actions that can guarantee safety as a serious devotion to the God.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Farabi
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30603/jf.v21i2.5232
Primary Topic
Cultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialektika Maddah Dalam Bencana Alam Gorontalo

Kiky Hanapi, Muhammad Rizal Panigoro
Farabi
Cultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
article

Dialektika Maddah Dalam Bencana Alam Gorontalo

Kiky Hanapi, Muhammad Rizal Panigoro
article en

Abstract

This qualitative research seeks to examine the relation and implicaton of maddah (da’wah teaching materials) to discover new understandings of Islamic teachings especially on the issues of natural disaster occured in Gorontalo. Data were collected through observation and in-depth interviews to the preachers, natural disaster victims, and the members of Indonesian Ulema Council of Gorontalo (MUI). This research reveals that there ara at least two main argument of maddah in responding natural disasters. In the first stream, there is maddah that focuses on how natural disaster should be coped with human repentances to the God due to their exploitative actions toward the natural balances; while on the other hand, a madah that moves beyond boundaries of doctrines and ask for direct actions to save the earth. Built on the scholarship of dialectical framework, this paper argues that the difference between maddah teachings can be explained by contextualizing the issues of natural disaster through three primary principles: akidah, sharia and akhlaq. In praxis, this maddah’s vision then manifests in the spirit of natural disaster advocacy such as mutual aid, climate awareness and justice, caring and other collective actions that can guarantee safety as a serious devotion to the God.

FarabiVol. 21(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.