The Bureaucracy and ‘Yanlun(言論)’ in the Ming and Qing Dynasties

This article explores the historical evolution of Yanlun (言論) during the Ming and Qing dynasties. In early modern Chinese society, Yanlun carried a specific political connotation. During the Ming dynasty, the censorial system expanded nationwide, and circuit censors were responsible not only for overseeing judicial and administrative matters but also for evaluating the local officials. Amidst this trend, the mid-Ming period witnessed a significant expansion of channels for public discourse (Yanlu, 言路).BR/ Under Qing rule, the Yanlu, which had flourished just a century earlier and served as a bridge between central and local society, came to an almost complete halt. The role of circuit censors (巡按御史) in relaying public discourse was abolished, and the system of transmitting information through public opinion channels was replaced by the new Memorials (Zouzhe, 奏摺), which established direct communication between the Emperor and provincial high officials. From the perspective of power and communication, the Ming and Qing dynasties present a stark contrast, to the extent that each could serve as a cautionary example for the other. The state’s monopoly over communication methods in this way is believed to have influenced the Qing dynasty’s response strategies during the late 18th century when it faced rapidly escalating crises.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF ASIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17856/jahs.2024.9.168.001
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Bureaucracy and ‘Yanlun(言論)’ in the Ming and Qing Dynasties

Hye Won
JOURNAL OF ASIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES
Chinese history and philosophy
article

The Bureaucracy and ‘Yanlun(言論)’ in the Ming and Qing Dynasties

Hye Won
article en

Abstract

This article explores the historical evolution of Yanlun (言論) during the Ming and Qing dynasties. In early modern Chinese society, Yanlun carried a specific political connotation. During the Ming dynasty, the censorial system expanded nationwide, and circuit censors were responsible not only for overseeing judicial and administrative matters but also for evaluating the local officials. Amidst this trend, the mid-Ming period witnessed a significant expansion of channels for public discourse (Yanlu, 言路).BR/ Under Qing rule, the Yanlu, which had flourished just a century earlier and served as a bridge between central and local society, came to an almost complete halt. The role of circuit censors (巡按御史) in relaying public discourse was abolished, and the system of transmitting information through public opinion channels was replaced by the new Memorials (Zouzhe, 奏摺), which established direct communication between the Emperor and provincial high officials. From the perspective of power and communication, the Ming and Qing dynasties present a stark contrast, to the extent that each could serve as a cautionary example for the other. The state’s monopoly over communication methods in this way is believed to have influenced the Qing dynasty’s response strategies during the late 18th century when it faced rapidly escalating crises.

JOURNAL OF ASIAN HISTORICAL STUDIESVol. 168
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Bureaucracy and ‘Yanlun(言論)’ in the Ming and Qing Dynasties — Hye Won · JOURNAL OF ASIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS