Abstract 7345: Differences in complete screening adherence across age, income, and education groups

Abstract There is limited knowledge of the sociodemographic characteristics of individuals who are fully adherent to all recommended cancer screening tests. Understanding these cancer screening gaps may provide insights into subpopulations who may benefit from interventions to increase overall early cancer detection. The Cancer Prevention Study- 3 is a prospective cohort study established by the American Cancer Society (enrollment 2006-2013). Between enrollment and 2018, cancer-free participants reported cancer screening tests (mammography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, stool testing, and low dose lung computed tomography (CT) scans) and year(s) of each screening. Eligibility for each test was determined using 2018 American Cancer Society guidelines. For each person, an adherence score was calculated based on the number of eligible screenings and whether they were adherent. Patterns of adherence were compared across age, education, and income groups using an ANOVA to determine statistical significance. 129, 927 individuals were included in this analysis. Men had a higher proportion of no screening adherence (17%), and complete adherence (81%) compared to women, 8% and 67%, respectively. For those 45-55 years old (N=37, 393), approximately 46% were not completely adherent, compared to only 24% of those > 55 years old. Likewise, study participants who had an annual income <$50, 000 or a high school degree or less, had a higher proportion of individuals with partial or no adherence versus those who had an annual income ≥$100, 000 or a college degree or higher. Given the significant differences in adherence by age, income level, and education, consideration of bundled screening (getting multiple screenings during a single visit), especially for some populations, may provide an opportunity to increase complete screening adherence, potentially reducing the number of cancers diagnosed at an advanced stage and increasing survival. Citation Format: Kierstin M. Faw, Jamal R. Winn, Robert A. Smith, Ahmedin Jemal, Parichoy Pal Choudhury, Priti Bandi, Jordan A. Baeker Bispo, Alpa V. Patel. Differences in complete screening adherence across age, income, and education groups [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 7345.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-7345
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 7345: Differences in complete screening adherence across age, income, and education groups

Ahmedin Jemal, Robert Allen Smith, Alpa V. Patel, Priti Bandi et al.
Cancer Research
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Abstract 7345: Differences in complete screening adherence across age, income, and education groups

Ahmedin Jemal, Robert Allen Smith, Alpa V. Patel, Priti Bandi, Parichoy Pal Choudhury, Jordan Baeker Bispo, Kierstin Faw, Judith Winn
article en

Abstract

Abstract There is limited knowledge of the sociodemographic characteristics of individuals who are fully adherent to all recommended cancer screening tests. Understanding these cancer screening gaps may provide insights into subpopulations who may benefit from interventions to increase overall early cancer detection. The Cancer Prevention Study- 3 is a prospective cohort study established by the American Cancer Society (enrollment 2006-2013). Between enrollment and 2018, cancer-free participants reported cancer screening tests (mammography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, stool testing, and low dose lung computed tomography (CT) scans) and year(s) of each screening. Eligibility for each test was determined using 2018 American Cancer Society guidelines. For each person, an adherence score was calculated based on the number of eligible screenings and whether they were adherent. Patterns of adherence were compared across age, education, and income groups using an ANOVA to determine statistical significance. 129, 927 individuals were included in this analysis. Men had a higher proportion of no screening adherence (17%), and complete adherence (81%) compared to women, 8% and 67%, respectively. For those 45-55 years old (N=37, 393), approximately 46% were not completely adherent, compared to only 24% of those > 55 years old. Likewise, study participants who had an annual income <$50, 000 or a high school degree or less, had a higher proportion of individuals with partial or no adherence versus those who had an annual income ≥$100, 000 or a college degree or higher. Given the significant differences in adherence by age, income level, and education, consideration of bundled screening (getting multiple screenings during a single visit), especially for some populations, may provide an opportunity to increase complete screening adherence, potentially reducing the number of cancers diagnosed at an advanced stage and increasing survival. Citation Format: Kierstin M. Faw, Jamal R. Winn, Robert A. Smith, Ahmedin Jemal, Parichoy Pal Choudhury, Priti Bandi, Jordan A. Baeker Bispo, Alpa V. Patel. Differences in complete screening adherence across age, income, and education groups [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 7345.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
American Cancer Society (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.