Management Concepts of Bisphosphonate-Related Atypical Femoral Fractures

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Osteoporosis is an important health issue worldwide, and bisphosphonates are commonly prescribed for its treatment. However, certain complications can occur with long-term bisphosphonate therapy. The complication highlighted in this study was atypical femoral fractures, which are rare but significant. The orthopedic consensus identifies surgical intervention as the gold-standard treatment for atypical femoral fractures, typically involving intramedullary or cephalomedullary nailing (CMN). The aim was to monitor patients for a follow-up period exceeding six months after surgical fixation with a CMN, with the majority of patients being followed up for more than 18 months after their initial surgery. <b>Methods</b>: This single-center analysis was conducted on a mixed cohort comprising a total of 10 patients. The study was conducted between September and November 2024. The inclusion criterion was surgical treatment for bisphosphonate-related atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) between June 2022 and November 2024 at a Level 1 Trauma Center, Cork University Hospital in the Republic of Ireland. The patients were monitored through a structured follow-up protocol that extended beyond six months, with the majority of patients being followed up for over 18 months. Follow-up assessments were conducted at defined intervals, including key evaluations at 3 and 6 months and at their final review. Clinical parameters such as pain, functional recovery, and radiological healing were considered. <b>Results</b>: No significant functional difference was observed at follow-up between the patients who sustained displaced fractures and those who presented with undisplaced fractures. Sixty percent of the patients remained pain-free from the 3-month postoperative follow-up, and the same percentage continued to be pain-free at the final follow-up. <b>Conclusions</b>: Cephalomedullary nailing is a safe option for the treatment of atypical femoral fractures. Patients with a bisphosphonate atypical femoral fracture should undergo bilateral screening and should be followed up for a longer period than the standard post-traumatic care intervals that are in place for typical femoral fractures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082858
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management Concepts of Bisphosphonate-Related Atypical Femoral Fractures

Liviu-Coriolan Misca, Jenel Marian Pătraşcu, Rehan Gul
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Bone health and osteoporosis research
1.72
article

Management Concepts of Bisphosphonate-Related Atypical Femoral Fractures

Liviu-Coriolan Misca, Jenel Marian Pătraşcu, Rehan Gul
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Osteoporosis is an important health issue worldwide, and bisphosphonates are commonly prescribed for its treatment. However, certain complications can occur with long-term bisphosphonate therapy. The complication highlighted in this study was atypical femoral fractures, which are rare but significant. The orthopedic consensus identifies surgical intervention as the gold-standard treatment for atypical femoral fractures, typically involving intramedullary or cephalomedullary nailing (CMN). The aim was to monitor patients for a follow-up period exceeding six months after surgical fixation with a CMN, with the majority of patients being followed up for more than 18 months after their initial surgery. <b>Methods</b>: This single-center analysis was conducted on a mixed cohort comprising a total of 10 patients. The study was conducted between September and November 2024. The inclusion criterion was surgical treatment for bisphosphonate-related atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) between June 2022 and November 2024 at a Level 1 Trauma Center, Cork University Hospital in the Republic of Ireland. The patients were monitored through a structured follow-up protocol that extended beyond six months, with the majority of patients being followed up for over 18 months. Follow-up assessments were conducted at defined intervals, including key evaluations at 3 and 6 months and at their final review. Clinical parameters such as pain, functional recovery, and radiological healing were considered. <b>Results</b>: No significant functional difference was observed at follow-up between the patients who sustained displaced fractures and those who presented with undisplaced fractures. Sixty percent of the patients remained pain-free from the 3-month postoperative follow-up, and the same percentage continued to be pain-free at the final follow-up. <b>Conclusions</b>: Cephalomedullary nailing is a safe option for the treatment of atypical femoral fractures. Patients with a bisphosphonate atypical femoral fracture should undergo bilateral screening and should be followed up for a longer period than the standard post-traumatic care intervals that are in place for typical femoral fractures.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(8)
University College Cork (IE), Cork University Hospital (IE), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.