Abstract 4911: Cancer disparities based on seven years of sexual orientation and gender identity collection at an NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center

Abstract Background: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations are underserved and minoritized. To aid in identifying real world cancer disparities among SGM patients, in 2016 our institution began collecting sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) on all patients. Leveraging these valuable data, this study analyzed differences between SGM and non-SGM cancer patients for clinical characteristics and quality-of-life (QoL). Methods: Data were acquired on >118, 000 patients who completed the standard-of-care Electronic Patient Questionnaire which collects self-reported SOGI. Patients were categorized as SGM or non-SGM based on SOGI. Clinical covariates were obtained from cancer registry for a subset of 51, 189 patients. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were used. Results: ∼3.2% of patients self-identified as SGM. Cancer diagnoses: Breast cancer was the most common diagnosis in SGM and non-SGM patients, followed by melanoma, hematologic, prostate, and lung cancers. Notably, SGM patients exhibited higher-than-expected rates of anorectal (6.8% vs. 0.7%, p<0.001) and uterine cancers (5.4% vs. 3.6%, p<0.001) compared to non-SGM patients. Age: Among the cancers analyzed, the mean age at diagnosis was significantly (p<0.001) lower for SGM compared to non-SGM: breast (54.8 vs. 60.5), melanoma (57.8 vs. 65.5), hematologic (62.0 vs. 67.1), prostate (65.4 vs. 68.1), lung (63.4 vs. 68.9), anorectal (55.1 vs. 64.4), and uterine (55.1 vs. 63.6). Stage: Among anorectal cancers, SGM were more likely to be diagnosed carcinoma in situ compared to non-SGM (45.8% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.001). For uterine cancers, SGM were more frequently diagnosed at stage II compared to non-SGM patients (18.2% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.008). No significant differences were observed for breast, lung, and hematologic cancers. Survival: Cancer site specific analysis revealed no significant differences. QOL: Concerns about barriers to seeking care were significantly higher (p<0.001) among SGM patients with breast (27.0% vs. 15.3%), lung (14.3% vs. 27.2%), and anorectal (35.9% vs. 15.5%) cancers. SGM patients with prostate cancer showed statistically significant lower social support (8.0% vs. 2.9%, p<0.001) and higher rates of living alone (28.4% vs. 10.8%, p<0.001), with similarly higher rates of living alone among SGM patients with anorectal cancer (33.9% vs. 16.3%, p=0.007). Worse mental health was reported by SGM patients with breast, hematologic, melanoma, prostate, uterine cancers (p<0.001), and SGM breast cancer patients had lower physical health scores (47.2% vs. 45.3%, p=0.042). Conclusions: SGM patients were diagnosed at younger age, diagnosed at higher rates of some cancer types, experienced elevated psychosocial challenges, reported worse mental health, and higher barriers to obtaining care. These findings highlight the value of SOGI data in advancing health equity in oncology. Citation Format: Shahrzad A. Zamani, Jaileene Pérez-Morales, Min-Jeong Yang, Matthew B. Schabath. Cancer disparities based on seven years of sexual orientation and gender identity collection at an NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4911.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-4911
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4911: Cancer disparities based on seven years of sexual orientation and gender identity collection at an NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center

Shahrzad A. Zamani, Jaileene Pérez‐Morales, Matthew B. Schabath, Min-Jeong Yang
1 links
Cancer Research
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Abstract 4911: Cancer disparities based on seven years of sexual orientation and gender identity collection at an NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center

Shahrzad A. Zamani, Jaileene Pérez‐Morales, Matthew B. Schabath, Min-Jeong Yang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations are underserved and minoritized. To aid in identifying real world cancer disparities among SGM patients, in 2016 our institution began collecting sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) on all patients. Leveraging these valuable data, this study analyzed differences between SGM and non-SGM cancer patients for clinical characteristics and quality-of-life (QoL). Methods: Data were acquired on >118, 000 patients who completed the standard-of-care Electronic Patient Questionnaire which collects self-reported SOGI. Patients were categorized as SGM or non-SGM based on SOGI. Clinical covariates were obtained from cancer registry for a subset of 51, 189 patients. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were used. Results: ∼3.2% of patients self-identified as SGM. Cancer diagnoses: Breast cancer was the most common diagnosis in SGM and non-SGM patients, followed by melanoma, hematologic, prostate, and lung cancers. Notably, SGM patients exhibited higher-than-expected rates of anorectal (6.8% vs. 0.7%, p<0.001) and uterine cancers (5.4% vs. 3.6%, p<0.001) compared to non-SGM patients. Age: Among the cancers analyzed, the mean age at diagnosis was significantly (p<0.001) lower for SGM compared to non-SGM: breast (54.8 vs. 60.5), melanoma (57.8 vs. 65.5), hematologic (62.0 vs. 67.1), prostate (65.4 vs. 68.1), lung (63.4 vs. 68.9), anorectal (55.1 vs. 64.4), and uterine (55.1 vs. 63.6). Stage: Among anorectal cancers, SGM were more likely to be diagnosed carcinoma in situ compared to non-SGM (45.8% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.001). For uterine cancers, SGM were more frequently diagnosed at stage II compared to non-SGM patients (18.2% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.008). No significant differences were observed for breast, lung, and hematologic cancers. Survival: Cancer site specific analysis revealed no significant differences. QOL: Concerns about barriers to seeking care were significantly higher (p<0.001) among SGM patients with breast (27.0% vs. 15.3%), lung (14.3% vs. 27.2%), and anorectal (35.9% vs. 15.5%) cancers. SGM patients with prostate cancer showed statistically significant lower social support (8.0% vs. 2.9%, p<0.001) and higher rates of living alone (28.4% vs. 10.8%, p<0.001), with similarly higher rates of living alone among SGM patients with anorectal cancer (33.9% vs. 16.3%, p=0.007). Worse mental health was reported by SGM patients with breast, hematologic, melanoma, prostate, uterine cancers (p<0.001), and SGM breast cancer patients had lower physical health scores (47.2% vs. 45.3%, p=0.042). Conclusions: SGM patients were diagnosed at younger age, diagnosed at higher rates of some cancer types, experienced elevated psychosocial challenges, reported worse mental health, and higher barriers to obtaining care. These findings highlight the value of SOGI data in advancing health equity in oncology. Citation Format: Shahrzad A. Zamani, Jaileene Pérez-Morales, Min-Jeong Yang, Matthew B. Schabath. Cancer disparities based on seven years of sexual orientation and gender identity collection at an NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4911.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.