Abstract 7408: Factors influencing false positive low-dose computed tomography-based lung cancer screening in an urban, safety-net system

Abstract Background: False-positive results from low-dose computed tomography (LDCT)-based lung cancer screening can result in unnecessary follow-up tests, increased patient anxiety, and higher healthcare costs. We evaluated the prevalence of false-positive LDCT results and assessed factors associated with these LDCT results within an integrated, urban safety-net healthcare system serving a diverse and underserved population. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Electronic health records data from Parkland Health, an integrated safety-net provider in Dallas, Texas (January 1, 2017-May 31, 2022), with a 1-year follow-up period through May 31, 2023. Outcome: False-positive LDCT was defined as positive screen (lung RADS 3, 4A, 4B or 4X) followed by a negative completed work-up or no diagnosis of lung cancer after 12-month follow-up. Analysis: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between patient characteristics (patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, preferred language, insurance status, comorbidity score, smoking status and smoking pack-years) and a false-positive LDCT. Results: A total of 2525 LDCTs were included from 2029 patients. Of these, lung cancer was diagnosed in 12 patients (0.6%), and 394 (19.4%) were classified as false-positive. Median age was 62 years, 59% were men, 49% were non-Hispanic Black, 16% were Hispanic, and the median pack-years were 40. In both univariable and multivariable analyses, age was significantly associated with false positive LDCT results. Patients aged 65-70 years (OR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.06-3.10) and >70 years (OR=2.02, 95% CI: 1.15-3.54) had higher odds of false-positive results compared to those aged 50-54 years. Conclusion: In our integrated safety-net healthcare system, approximately one in 5 patients had a false-positive LDCT result, and age was a significant contributor. Patients aged 65 years and older were more likely to experience false-positive findings, suggesting that age-related factors may influence the diagnostic accuracy of LDCT. Future studies are needed to replicate these findings and further minimize unnecessary follow-up interventions, particularly in older populations. Citation Format: Rutu Rathod, Urooj Wahid, Asha Kandathil, Mary Gwin, Sheena Bhalla, Song Zhang, Andrea Semlow, Vijaya Natchimuthu, Sarah Malone, George Oliver, David H. Johnson, Megan A. Mullins, David Gerber, Rasmi Nair. Factors influencing false positive low-dose computed tomography-based lung cancer screening in an urban, safety-net system [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 7408.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-7408
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 7408: Factors influencing false positive low-dose computed tomography-based lung cancer screening in an urban, safety-net system

Rasmi G. Nair, Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu, Sarah Malone, Gretchen D. Oliver et al.
1 citations
Cancer Research
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
article

Abstract 7408: Factors influencing false positive low-dose computed tomography-based lung cancer screening in an urban, safety-net system

Rasmi G. Nair, Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu, Sarah Malone, Gretchen D. Oliver, Sheena Bhalla, Megan A. Mullins, Asha Kandathil, David A. Gerber, Andrea R. Semlow, Mary Gwin, Urooj Wahid, Song Zhang, David H. Johnson, Rutu Rathod
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: False-positive results from low-dose computed tomography (LDCT)-based lung cancer screening can result in unnecessary follow-up tests, increased patient anxiety, and higher healthcare costs. We evaluated the prevalence of false-positive LDCT results and assessed factors associated with these LDCT results within an integrated, urban safety-net healthcare system serving a diverse and underserved population. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Electronic health records data from Parkland Health, an integrated safety-net provider in Dallas, Texas (January 1, 2017-May 31, 2022), with a 1-year follow-up period through May 31, 2023. Outcome: False-positive LDCT was defined as positive screen (lung RADS 3, 4A, 4B or 4X) followed by a negative completed work-up or no diagnosis of lung cancer after 12-month follow-up. Analysis: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between patient characteristics (patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, preferred language, insurance status, comorbidity score, smoking status and smoking pack-years) and a false-positive LDCT. Results: A total of 2525 LDCTs were included from 2029 patients. Of these, lung cancer was diagnosed in 12 patients (0.6%), and 394 (19.4%) were classified as false-positive. Median age was 62 years, 59% were men, 49% were non-Hispanic Black, 16% were Hispanic, and the median pack-years were 40. In both univariable and multivariable analyses, age was significantly associated with false positive LDCT results. Patients aged 65-70 years (OR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.06-3.10) and >70 years (OR=2.02, 95% CI: 1.15-3.54) had higher odds of false-positive results compared to those aged 50-54 years. Conclusion: In our integrated safety-net healthcare system, approximately one in 5 patients had a false-positive LDCT result, and age was a significant contributor. Patients aged 65 years and older were more likely to experience false-positive findings, suggesting that age-related factors may influence the diagnostic accuracy of LDCT. Future studies are needed to replicate these findings and further minimize unnecessary follow-up interventions, particularly in older populations. Citation Format: Rutu Rathod, Urooj Wahid, Asha Kandathil, Mary Gwin, Sheena Bhalla, Song Zhang, Andrea Semlow, Vijaya Natchimuthu, Sarah Malone, George Oliver, David H. Johnson, Megan A. Mullins, David Gerber, Rasmi Nair. Factors influencing false positive low-dose computed tomography-based lung cancer screening in an urban, safety-net system [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 7408.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
Parkland Health & Hospital System (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.