Riverine agroforestry systems: Tree diversity and species structure along Lilagar river catchment in Chhattisgarh, India

Riverine agroforestry is essential for maintaining biodiversity, climate-resilient farming as well as maintaining river flow. However, our rivers are drying and diminishing due to increasing anthropogenic activities in the riverine ecosystem. In this study, the riverine agroforestry system along the Lilagar river, Bilaspur, India was compared with the natural forest in terms of tree diversity, structure, and composition. Ten grid points at 10 km intervals along the riverine habitat covering 100 km length of the river were undertaken. A number of trees, IVI, Shannon–Weiner Index, dominance, evenness index, etc., were analysed and compared with both the land use system. Thirty-seven tree species were reported in riverine agroforestry systems, compared to 28 tree species from the natural forest. Tree species belonging to the Fabaceae family dominate in riverine agroforestry while Combetaceae and Anacardiaceae are in the natural forest. Tree density was found 86.25 ha − 1 in agroforestry and 419.11 trees ha − 1 in a natural forest. For riverine farmland and natural forests, the Shannon diversity index was 1.69 and 2.38, respectively, whereas the evenness index was measured at 0.473 and 0.703 for these two land use systems. Species dissimilarities were recorded in both the land use system. The results show that riverine agroforestry complements the natural forest for biodiversity conservation and supports in counteracting the loss of tree species from the natural ecosystem. Hence, promoting agroforestry in farmlands should be part of the biodiversity conservation strategy and increase riverine sustainability. • Agroforestry is the major components of the sustain environment. • Riverine agroforestry is essential for maintaining biodiversity, climate-resilient farming as well as maintaining river flow. • Riverine agroforestry complements the natural forest for biodiversity conservation. • Agroforestry is a part of biodiversity conservation strategy and increase riverine sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Green Technologies and Sustainability
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2025.100211
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Riverine agroforestry systems: Tree diversity and species structure along Lilagar river catchment in Chhattisgarh, India

Arun Kumar Shukla, Atul Kumar Bhardwaj, K. K. Chandra, Rajesh Kumar
2 citations
Green Technologies and Sustainability
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
12.86
article

Riverine agroforestry systems: Tree diversity and species structure along Lilagar river catchment in Chhattisgarh, India

Arun Kumar Shukla, Atul Kumar Bhardwaj, K. K. Chandra, Rajesh Kumar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Riverine agroforestry is essential for maintaining biodiversity, climate-resilient farming as well as maintaining river flow. However, our rivers are drying and diminishing due to increasing anthropogenic activities in the riverine ecosystem. In this study, the riverine agroforestry system along the Lilagar river, Bilaspur, India was compared with the natural forest in terms of tree diversity, structure, and composition. Ten grid points at 10 km intervals along the riverine habitat covering 100 km length of the river were undertaken. A number of trees, IVI, Shannon–Weiner Index, dominance, evenness index, etc., were analysed and compared with both the land use system. Thirty-seven tree species were reported in riverine agroforestry systems, compared to 28 tree species from the natural forest. Tree species belonging to the Fabaceae family dominate in riverine agroforestry while Combetaceae and Anacardiaceae are in the natural forest. Tree density was found 86.25 ha − 1 in agroforestry and 419.11 trees ha − 1 in a natural forest. For riverine farmland and natural forests, the Shannon diversity index was 1.69 and 2.38, respectively, whereas the evenness index was measured at 0.473 and 0.703 for these two land use systems. Species dissimilarities were recorded in both the land use system. The results show that riverine agroforestry complements the natural forest for biodiversity conservation and supports in counteracting the loss of tree species from the natural ecosystem. Hence, promoting agroforestry in farmlands should be part of the biodiversity conservation strategy and increase riverine sustainability. • Agroforestry is the major components of the sustain environment. • Riverine agroforestry is essential for maintaining biodiversity, climate-resilient farming as well as maintaining river flow. • Riverine agroforestry complements the natural forest for biodiversity conservation. • Agroforestry is a part of biodiversity conservation strategy and increase riverine sustainability.

Green Technologies and SustainabilityVol. 3(3)
Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (IN), Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya (IN)
University Grants Commission
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
12.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.