Similarities and differences between dog–human and human–human relationships

Most dog owners in Western countries regard their dogs as companions or family members, prompting extensive research on the human-animal bond. However, many studies rely on broad categories or single dimensions, such as satisfaction or attachment, which can oversimplify the complexity of these relationships. In contrast, our study employed a multifaceted approach, examining the dog-owner bond across 13 relationship scales and comparing these scales to four different types of human relationships to reveal the human-like roles of dogs within a family. Participants (N = 717) characterized their relationships with their dog and four human partners: closest kin, romantic partner, best friend, and child, using the Network of Relationships Inventory. The results showed that owners reported greater satisfaction with their dogs than with any human partner except their child. They received more Support from dogs than from any human partner except their child and experienced fewer Negative Interactions with their dogs compared to any human partner, except their best friend. Overall, the relationship with the dog provided high Companionship, opportunities for Nurturance, and minimal Negative Interactions. This may stem from the fact that the dog-human relationship features a more asymmetric power dynamic than human relationships - i.e., owners have full control over the dog's life. Interestingly, a good relationship with a dog might also reflect the owner's positive relationships with humans. In conclusion, the dog-human relationship exhibits characteristics of both child and best friend relationships, combining the positive aspects of the parent-child bond with the minimal negative interactions of close friendships. Characterizing the dog-owner relationship as a set of social provisions offers a valid way to evaluate relationships with dogs, providing an alternative theoretical framework to attachment theory for comparing dog-human and human-human relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95515-8
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Similarities and differences between dog–human and human–human relationships

Dorottya Júlia Ujfalussy, Ádám Miklósi, Andrea Kerepesi, Enikő Kubinyi et al.
9 citations
Scientific Reports
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
16.36
article

Similarities and differences between dog–human and human–human relationships

Dorottya Júlia Ujfalussy, Ádám Miklósi, Andrea Kerepesi, Enikő Kubinyi, Borbála Turcsán
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Most dog owners in Western countries regard their dogs as companions or family members, prompting extensive research on the human-animal bond. However, many studies rely on broad categories or single dimensions, such as satisfaction or attachment, which can oversimplify the complexity of these relationships. In contrast, our study employed a multifaceted approach, examining the dog-owner bond across 13 relationship scales and comparing these scales to four different types of human relationships to reveal the human-like roles of dogs within a family. Participants (N = 717) characterized their relationships with their dog and four human partners: closest kin, romantic partner, best friend, and child, using the Network of Relationships Inventory. The results showed that owners reported greater satisfaction with their dogs than with any human partner except their child. They received more Support from dogs than from any human partner except their child and experienced fewer Negative Interactions with their dogs compared to any human partner, except their best friend. Overall, the relationship with the dog provided high Companionship, opportunities for Nurturance, and minimal Negative Interactions. This may stem from the fact that the dog-human relationship features a more asymmetric power dynamic than human relationships - i.e., owners have full control over the dog's life. Interestingly, a good relationship with a dog might also reflect the owner's positive relationships with humans. In conclusion, the dog-human relationship exhibits characteristics of both child and best friend relationships, combining the positive aspects of the parent-child bond with the minimal negative interactions of close friendships. Characterizing the dog-owner relationship as a set of social provisions offers a valid way to evaluate relationships with dogs, providing an alternative theoretical framework to attachment theory for comparing dog-human and human-human relationships.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Brainvest (Hungary) (HU), Institute for Soil Sciences (HU)
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
16.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.