Some Reflections on the Northern Territory’s Aboriginal Justice Agreement

The Northern Territory Government’s flagship Indigenous justice policy is the Aboriginal Justice Agreement 2021-2027 (NTAJA). Such agreements have been found to make a positive difference in reducing Indigenous incarceration rates in other jurisdictions. Since the NTAJA was introduced, the Indigenous incarceration rate in the Northern Territory has increased. Even allowing for the fact that many variables affect the incarceration rate, I suggest some features of the NTAJA make it unsuitable for achieving a genuine reduction in the Indigenous incarceration rate. I reflect on the circumstances preceding, and immediately following, the introduction of the NTAJA. I examine the public preoccupation with youth crime in the Northern Territory and argue that the NTAJA’s lack of focus on youth, particularly on reducing youth detention rates, makes it unlikely to resolve the social tensions that stoke destructive “tough on crime” approaches to community safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.3709
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Some Reflections on the Northern Territory’s Aboriginal Justice Agreement

Stephen W. Enciso
International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Some Reflections on the Northern Territory’s Aboriginal Justice Agreement

Stephen W. Enciso
article en

Abstract

The Northern Territory Government’s flagship Indigenous justice policy is the Aboriginal Justice Agreement 2021-2027 (NTAJA). Such agreements have been found to make a positive difference in reducing Indigenous incarceration rates in other jurisdictions. Since the NTAJA was introduced, the Indigenous incarceration rate in the Northern Territory has increased. Even allowing for the fact that many variables affect the incarceration rate, I suggest some features of the NTAJA make it unsuitable for achieving a genuine reduction in the Indigenous incarceration rate. I reflect on the circumstances preceding, and immediately following, the introduction of the NTAJA. I examine the public preoccupation with youth crime in the Northern Territory and argue that the NTAJA’s lack of focus on youth, particularly on reducing youth detention rates, makes it unlikely to resolve the social tensions that stoke destructive “tough on crime” approaches to community safety.

International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
Charles Darwin University (AU)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.