Abstract 2514: Refining oncology dose selection: A framework for tailored dose optimization in the era of targeted and immunotherapies

Abstract Historically, oncology dose selection was driven by the identification of the maximum tolerated dose, often resulting in significant toxicity. The advent of molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies has created opportunities to achieve similar efficacy at a lower, more tolerable dose. Recent FDA draft guidance highlights the importance of dose optimization in drug development. Building on this, we present a novel framework categorizing drugs into four molecular classes based on their mechanisms of action: (1) small molecule targeted therapies and antibody-drug conjugates, (2) large molecule antagonists, (3) cancer immunotherapy agonists, and (4) molecules with limited or no single-agent activity. Unique considerations and strategies for dose optimization are detailed for each class, supported by case examples. We propose integrating proof of activity as a gating criterion for dose expansion to inform robust dose decisions and maximize the use of patient resources. This perspective underscores the integration of preclinical and clinical data—including pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and patient-reported outcomes—combined with quantitative pharmacology and statistical modeling, to optimize doses effectively while balancing efficacy and safety. While no one-size-fits-all approach exists, this tailored guidance for specific mechanistic classes provides balanced approaches to dose optimization that ultimately enhance the probability of success in drug development. Citation Format: Neekesh Dharia, Jiawen Zhu, Amy Schroeder, Sabine Frank, Christophe Boetsch, Candice Jamois, Nastya Kassir, Koorosh Korfi, Elizabeth Punnoose, Anjali Vaze, Peter Trask, Pritti Gosai, Jane Fridlyand, Chunze Li. Refining oncology dose selection: A framework for tailored dose optimization in the era of targeted and immunotherapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2514.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-2514
Primary Topic
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 2514: Refining oncology dose selection: A framework for tailored dose optimization in the era of targeted and immunotherapies

Candice Jamois, Elizabeth A. Punnoose, Neekesh V. Dharia, Peter C. Trask et al.
Cancer Research
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
article

Abstract 2514: Refining oncology dose selection: A framework for tailored dose optimization in the era of targeted and immunotherapies

Candice Jamois, Elizabeth A. Punnoose, Neekesh V. Dharia, Peter C. Trask, Jiawen Zhu, Pritti Gosai, Koorosh Korfi, Anjali Vaze, Nastya Kassir, Christophe Boetsch, Jane Fridlyand, Amy Schroeder, Chunze Li, Sabine Frank
article en

Abstract

Abstract Historically, oncology dose selection was driven by the identification of the maximum tolerated dose, often resulting in significant toxicity. The advent of molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies has created opportunities to achieve similar efficacy at a lower, more tolerable dose. Recent FDA draft guidance highlights the importance of dose optimization in drug development. Building on this, we present a novel framework categorizing drugs into four molecular classes based on their mechanisms of action: (1) small molecule targeted therapies and antibody-drug conjugates, (2) large molecule antagonists, (3) cancer immunotherapy agonists, and (4) molecules with limited or no single-agent activity. Unique considerations and strategies for dose optimization are detailed for each class, supported by case examples. We propose integrating proof of activity as a gating criterion for dose expansion to inform robust dose decisions and maximize the use of patient resources. This perspective underscores the integration of preclinical and clinical data—including pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and patient-reported outcomes—combined with quantitative pharmacology and statistical modeling, to optimize doses effectively while balancing efficacy and safety. While no one-size-fits-all approach exists, this tailored guidance for specific mechanistic classes provides balanced approaches to dose optimization that ultimately enhance the probability of success in drug development. Citation Format: Neekesh Dharia, Jiawen Zhu, Amy Schroeder, Sabine Frank, Christophe Boetsch, Candice Jamois, Nastya Kassir, Koorosh Korfi, Elizabeth Punnoose, Anjali Vaze, Peter Trask, Pritti Gosai, Jane Fridlyand, Chunze Li. Refining oncology dose selection: A framework for tailored dose optimization in the era of targeted and immunotherapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2514.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.