Person-centred process?: Procedural fairness and Care Act 2014 needs assessments

Abstract This article examines the process of seeking social care needs assessments under the Care Act 2014 in England through the lens of procedural fairness theory. Drawing on interviews with 21 individuals with experiences of needs assessments, we identify the ‘process qualities’—the factors rooted in the literature on procedural fairness—that matter most to people navigating this critical front-line component of the social care system. Our analysis reveals two themes: the importance of ‘dignified treatment’ and system ‘proactivity’, each underpinned by a set of process qualities. These qualities for the former—personalization, empathy, and voice—are well explored in the literature on person-centred care. However, the latter—responsibility taking, dependability, transparency, assistance, and availability—are neglected in current research on experiences of the Care Act 2014. Drawing on these process qualities, we set out the potential for future research grounded in procedural fairness theory in social care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Social Work
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaf076
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Person-centred process?: Procedural fairness and Care Act 2014 needs assessments

Joe Tomlinson, Jed Meers, Simon Halliday, Eppie Leishman
The British Journal of Social Work
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

Person-centred process?: Procedural fairness and Care Act 2014 needs assessments

Joe Tomlinson, Jed Meers, Simon Halliday, Eppie Leishman
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the process of seeking social care needs assessments under the Care Act 2014 in England through the lens of procedural fairness theory. Drawing on interviews with 21 individuals with experiences of needs assessments, we identify the ‘process qualities’—the factors rooted in the literature on procedural fairness—that matter most to people navigating this critical front-line component of the social care system. Our analysis reveals two themes: the importance of ‘dignified treatment’ and system ‘proactivity’, each underpinned by a set of process qualities. These qualities for the former—personalization, empathy, and voice—are well explored in the literature on person-centred care. However, the latter—responsibility taking, dependability, transparency, assistance, and availability—are neglected in current research on experiences of the Care Act 2014. Drawing on these process qualities, we set out the potential for future research grounded in procedural fairness theory in social care.

The British Journal of Social WorkVol. 55(6)
University of Strathclyde (GB), University of York (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.