Abstract 6219: Population-based analysis of rurality and its impact on survival in gastric adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background: Despite growing efforts to understand the impact of rurality on cancer survival outcomes, significant gaps remain on how it influences prognosis within specific cancer types. In this study, we examine how residential location (rural vs urban) affects survival outcomes for patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 56, 371 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma between 2007 and 2020, who were 18 years or older at diagnosis and had complete data for all analyzed variables. Demographics of patients living in rural vs urban areas were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-squared testing for categorical or continuous variables, respectively. The impact of area of residence on cancer-specific survival (CSS) was assessed through Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. A multivariable Weibull regression survival model was used to control for potential confounding covariates. Results: Most patients lived in urban areas (88.9% vs 11.1%). There were no significant differences in age and stage at diagnosis between rural and urban populations. Rural patients tended to be male (p < 0.001) and non-Hispanic White (p < 0.001) with lower median household income (p < 0.001). Patients residing in rural areas had significantly worse CSS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.158; 95% CI: 1.122-1.195; p < 0.0001]. When stratified by race, the prognostic impact of rurality was absent in Non-Hispanic Black patients (p = 0.62). When adjusting for age, sex, race, stage, and income, rurality remained an independent predictor of survival [HR = 1.064; 95% CI: 1.026-1.103; p = 0.0007]. Conclusion: Rurality is associated with worse prognosis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of how area of residence contributes to outcome disparities to identify targeted interventions. Citation Format: Nicole M. Hwang, Matthew Dixon. Population-based analysis of rurality and its impact on survival in gastric adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 6219.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-6219
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 6219: Population-based analysis of rurality and its impact on survival in gastric adenocarcinoma

Matthew Dixon, Nicole M. Hwang
Cancer Research
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 6219: Population-based analysis of rurality and its impact on survival in gastric adenocarcinoma

Matthew Dixon, Nicole M. Hwang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Despite growing efforts to understand the impact of rurality on cancer survival outcomes, significant gaps remain on how it influences prognosis within specific cancer types. In this study, we examine how residential location (rural vs urban) affects survival outcomes for patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 56, 371 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma between 2007 and 2020, who were 18 years or older at diagnosis and had complete data for all analyzed variables. Demographics of patients living in rural vs urban areas were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-squared testing for categorical or continuous variables, respectively. The impact of area of residence on cancer-specific survival (CSS) was assessed through Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. A multivariable Weibull regression survival model was used to control for potential confounding covariates. Results: Most patients lived in urban areas (88.9% vs 11.1%). There were no significant differences in age and stage at diagnosis between rural and urban populations. Rural patients tended to be male (p < 0.001) and non-Hispanic White (p < 0.001) with lower median household income (p < 0.001). Patients residing in rural areas had significantly worse CSS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.158; 95% CI: 1.122-1.195; p < 0.0001]. When stratified by race, the prognostic impact of rurality was absent in Non-Hispanic Black patients (p = 0.62). When adjusting for age, sex, race, stage, and income, rurality remained an independent predictor of survival [HR = 1.064; 95% CI: 1.026-1.103; p = 0.0007]. Conclusion: Rurality is associated with worse prognosis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of how area of residence contributes to outcome disparities to identify targeted interventions. Citation Format: Nicole M. Hwang, Matthew Dixon. Population-based analysis of rurality and its impact on survival in gastric adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 6219.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.