Abstract 1992: Detection rate for <i>ESR1</i> mutations is higher in CTC-derived genomic DNA than in paired plasma cfDNA samples as revealed by ddPCR

Abstract Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis to track estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations is highly beneficial for the identification of tumor molecular dynamics and the improvement of personalized treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Plasma cfDNA is, up to now, the most frequent liquid biopsy analyte used to evaluate ESR1 mutational status. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration and molecular characterization analysis provides important clinical information in patients with MBC. In this study, we investigated whether analysis of CTCs and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provide similar or complementary information for the analysis of ESR1 mutations. We analyzed both plasma cfDNA (n=90) and paired CTC-derived genomic DNA (gDNA; n=42) from 90 MBC patients for seven ESR1 mutations. Eight out of 90 (8.9%) plasma cfDNA samples tested using the ddPLEX Mutation Detection Assay (Bio-Rad), were found positive for one ESR1 mutation, whereas 11/42 (26.2%) CTC-derived gDNA samples were found positive for at least one ESR1 mutation. Direct comparison of paired samples (n=42) revealed that the ESR1 mutation rate was higher in CTC-derived gDNA (11/42, 26.2%) than in plasma cfDNA (6/42, 14.3%) samples. Our results, using this highly sensitive ddPLEX assay, reveal a higher percentage of mutations in CTC-derived gDNAs than in paired ctDNA in patients with MBC. CTC-derived gDNA analysis should be further evaluated as an important and complementary tool to ctDNA for identifying patients with ESR1 mutations and for guiding individualized therapy. Citation Format: Stavroula Smilkou, Aliki Ntzifa, Victoria Tserpeli, Ioanna Balgkouranidou, Alkistis Papatheodoridi, Evangelia Razis, Helena Linardou, Christos Papadimitriou, Amanda Psyrri, Flora Zagouri, Stylianos Kakolyris, Evi Lianidou. Detection rate for ESR1 mutations is higher in CTC-derived genomic DNA than in paired plasma cfDNA samples as revealed by ddPCR [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1992.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-1992
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 1992: Detection rate for ESR1 mutations is higher in CTC-derived genomic DNA than in paired plasma cfDNA samples as revealed by ddPCR

Helena Linardou, Aliki Ntzifa, Flora Zagouri, Ioanna Balgkouranidou et al.
Cancer Research
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 1992: Detection rate for ESR1 mutations is higher in CTC-derived genomic DNA than in paired plasma cfDNA samples as revealed by ddPCR

Helena Linardou, Aliki Ntzifa, Flora Zagouri, Ioanna Balgkouranidou, Evi Lianidou, Alkistis Papatheodoridi, Christos Papadimitriou, Amanda Psyrri, Stavroula Smilkou, Victoria Tserpeli, Evangelia D. Razis, Stylianos Kakolyris
article en

Abstract

Abstract Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis to track estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations is highly beneficial for the identification of tumor molecular dynamics and the improvement of personalized treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Plasma cfDNA is, up to now, the most frequent liquid biopsy analyte used to evaluate ESR1 mutational status. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration and molecular characterization analysis provides important clinical information in patients with MBC. In this study, we investigated whether analysis of CTCs and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provide similar or complementary information for the analysis of ESR1 mutations. We analyzed both plasma cfDNA (n=90) and paired CTC-derived genomic DNA (gDNA; n=42) from 90 MBC patients for seven ESR1 mutations. Eight out of 90 (8.9%) plasma cfDNA samples tested using the ddPLEX Mutation Detection Assay (Bio-Rad), were found positive for one ESR1 mutation, whereas 11/42 (26.2%) CTC-derived gDNA samples were found positive for at least one ESR1 mutation. Direct comparison of paired samples (n=42) revealed that the ESR1 mutation rate was higher in CTC-derived gDNA (11/42, 26.2%) than in plasma cfDNA (6/42, 14.3%) samples. Our results, using this highly sensitive ddPLEX assay, reveal a higher percentage of mutations in CTC-derived gDNAs than in paired ctDNA in patients with MBC. CTC-derived gDNA analysis should be further evaluated as an important and complementary tool to ctDNA for identifying patients with ESR1 mutations and for guiding individualized therapy. Citation Format: Stavroula Smilkou, Aliki Ntzifa, Victoria Tserpeli, Ioanna Balgkouranidou, Alkistis Papatheodoridi, Evangelia Razis, Helena Linardou, Christos Papadimitriou, Amanda Psyrri, Flora Zagouri, Stylianos Kakolyris, Evi Lianidou. Detection rate for ESR1 mutations is higher in CTC-derived genomic DNA than in paired plasma cfDNA samples as revealed by ddPCR [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1992.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Alexandra Hospital (GR), Hygeia Hospital (GR), Metropolitan Hospital (GR), Agia Olga Hospital (GR), University Hospital of Alexandroupolis (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.