Abstract 3994: Comparing ATP-based and image-based viability readouts for assessing treatment responses in patient-derived organoids

High-throughput viability determination often relies on quantifying intracellular Adenosine TriPhosphate (ATP) levels. While this offers a robust option for assessing the efficacy of various compounds, it poses significant challenges when assessing compounds that interfere with metabolic or differentiation pathways, which affect intracellular ATP levels. HUB Organoid Technology is built on the discovery that adult stem cells proliferate and organize into three-dimensional organotypic structures when embedded into an extracellular matrix. Patient-Derived Organoids (PDOs) are generated from normal and malignant tissues and stored as high-quality biobanks that yield highly reproducible results. HUB Organoids® recapitulate complex characteristics of the parental tissue, including molecular heterogeneity and morphological and functional traits. Notably, PDOs can differentiate when subjected to the right conditions. This study compared ATP-based and image-based viability readouts to determine the best fit for quantifying treatment response in a panel of PDOs exposed to drugs with different modes of action. Herein, we show that an ATP-based viability readout fails to detect a viability shift in organoids treated with compounds known to modulate differentiation and metabolism, which instead becomes apparent when using an image-based readout. On the other hand, both readouts are equally effective at detecting changes in organoid viability following treatment with Oxaliplatin and 5-FU, which affect DNA damage and replication, respectively. Our results reveal the importance of consulting an expert organoid service provider who has an in-depth understanding of organoid biology and who can tailor your study based on your compound's expected mode of action, thus increasing your program´s chance of success. Citation Format: Claudia Beaurivage, Tao Yang, Anna Schepers, Mayke Doorn, Sumeyra Mucuk, Merel Derksen, Sylvia F. Boj. Comparing ATP-based and image-based viability readouts for assessing treatment responses in patient-derived organoids [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3994.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-3994
Primary Topic
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 3994: Comparing ATP-based and image-based viability readouts for assessing treatment responses in patient-derived organoids

Claudia Beaurivage, Anna V. Schepers, Merel Derksen, Sylvia F. Boj et al.
Cancer Research
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
article

Abstract 3994: Comparing ATP-based and image-based viability readouts for assessing treatment responses in patient-derived organoids

Claudia Beaurivage, Anna V. Schepers, Merel Derksen, Sylvia F. Boj, Mayke Doorn, Sumeyra Mucuk, Tao Yang
article en

Abstract

High-throughput viability determination often relies on quantifying intracellular Adenosine TriPhosphate (ATP) levels. While this offers a robust option for assessing the efficacy of various compounds, it poses significant challenges when assessing compounds that interfere with metabolic or differentiation pathways, which affect intracellular ATP levels. HUB Organoid Technology is built on the discovery that adult stem cells proliferate and organize into three-dimensional organotypic structures when embedded into an extracellular matrix. Patient-Derived Organoids (PDOs) are generated from normal and malignant tissues and stored as high-quality biobanks that yield highly reproducible results. HUB Organoids® recapitulate complex characteristics of the parental tissue, including molecular heterogeneity and morphological and functional traits. Notably, PDOs can differentiate when subjected to the right conditions. This study compared ATP-based and image-based viability readouts to determine the best fit for quantifying treatment response in a panel of PDOs exposed to drugs with different modes of action. Herein, we show that an ATP-based viability readout fails to detect a viability shift in organoids treated with compounds known to modulate differentiation and metabolism, which instead becomes apparent when using an image-based readout. On the other hand, both readouts are equally effective at detecting changes in organoid viability following treatment with Oxaliplatin and 5-FU, which affect DNA damage and replication, respectively. Our results reveal the importance of consulting an expert organoid service provider who has an in-depth understanding of organoid biology and who can tailor your study based on your compound's expected mode of action, thus increasing your program´s chance of success. Citation Format: Claudia Beaurivage, Tao Yang, Anna Schepers, Mayke Doorn, Sumeyra Mucuk, Merel Derksen, Sylvia F. Boj. Comparing ATP-based and image-based viability readouts for assessing treatment responses in patient-derived organoids [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3994.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
SNV Netherlands Development Organisation (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.