Abstract 1956: Comparison of somatic variations between circulating tumor DNA and paired tissue in 1,111 pan-cancer patients

Abstract Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a noninvasive method to assess tumor-specific mutations. This retrospective study investigated the concordance of genomic variations between ctDNA and tissue and its influence factors. Paired blood and tissue samples were collected from 1, 111 patients with ten tumor types and underwent sequencing of 425 genes. We evaluated the relationship between the concentration of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), sensitivity of ctDNA, mutation landscape, variant allele frequency, and various clinical parameters. The median concentration of cfDNA and overall sensitivity of ctDNA was 16.8 ng/ml and 61.5%, which correlated positively with clinical stage and tumor diameter and negatively with treatment response. The overall concordance rate of genomic alterations between ctDNA and tissue was 24.6%. The top five altered genes and pathway-based disruption signatures identified by ctDNA profiling were similar to tissue. For mutations with a normalized allele frequency less than 0.2, the proportion of ctDNA-specific mutations was higher than concordant mutations (61.5% and 9.7%). Advanced clinical stage, large tumor diameter, poor treatment response, the presence of liver metastasis, and impaired liver function lead to a high concordance rate. Patients with ctDNA-positive status, subclonal mutations, and more ctDNA-specific mutations had shorter overall survival than those with ctDNA-negative status, no subclonal mutations, and fewer ctDNA-specific mutations, respectively. In conclusion, a higher concordance rate of somatic variations between ctDNA and tissue indicated an advanced clinical stage, larger tumor size, worse treatment response, and presence of liver metastasis. Subclonal or more ctDNA-specific mutations detected were associated with poor prognosis. Citation Format: Meng Zhang, Yi Feng, Xue Du, Changda Qu, Meizhu Meng, Meiying Ye, Min Liang, Ziran Yang, Wenjuan Gong, Xingyu Ma, Jialiang Guo, Wenmei Li, Chenxuan Wang, Qiuxiang Ou, Sha Wang, Haimeng Tang, Shuqin Jia. Comparison of somatic variations between circulating tumor DNA and paired tissue in , pan-cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1956.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-1956
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 1956: Comparison of somatic variations between circulating tumor DNA and paired tissue in 1,111 pan-cancer patients

Ziqing Yang, Meizhu Meng, Xue Du, Changda Qu et al.
Cancer Research
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 1956: Comparison of somatic variations between circulating tumor DNA and paired tissue in 1,111 pan-cancer patients

Ziqing Yang, Meizhu Meng, Xue Du, Changda Qu, Min Liang, Shuqin Jia, Xingyu Ma, Qiuxiang Ou, Wenmei Li, Weiyu Gong, Meng Zhang, Sha Wang, Chenxuan Wang, Jialiang Guo, Yi Feng, Haimeng Tang, Meiying Ye
article en

Abstract

Abstract Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a noninvasive method to assess tumor-specific mutations. This retrospective study investigated the concordance of genomic variations between ctDNA and tissue and its influence factors. Paired blood and tissue samples were collected from 1, 111 patients with ten tumor types and underwent sequencing of 425 genes. We evaluated the relationship between the concentration of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), sensitivity of ctDNA, mutation landscape, variant allele frequency, and various clinical parameters. The median concentration of cfDNA and overall sensitivity of ctDNA was 16.8 ng/ml and 61.5%, which correlated positively with clinical stage and tumor diameter and negatively with treatment response. The overall concordance rate of genomic alterations between ctDNA and tissue was 24.6%. The top five altered genes and pathway-based disruption signatures identified by ctDNA profiling were similar to tissue. For mutations with a normalized allele frequency less than 0.2, the proportion of ctDNA-specific mutations was higher than concordant mutations (61.5% and 9.7%). Advanced clinical stage, large tumor diameter, poor treatment response, the presence of liver metastasis, and impaired liver function lead to a high concordance rate. Patients with ctDNA-positive status, subclonal mutations, and more ctDNA-specific mutations had shorter overall survival than those with ctDNA-negative status, no subclonal mutations, and fewer ctDNA-specific mutations, respectively. In conclusion, a higher concordance rate of somatic variations between ctDNA and tissue indicated an advanced clinical stage, larger tumor size, worse treatment response, and presence of liver metastasis. Subclonal or more ctDNA-specific mutations detected were associated with poor prognosis. Citation Format: Meng Zhang, Yi Feng, Xue Du, Changda Qu, Meizhu Meng, Meiying Ye, Min Liang, Ziran Yang, Wenjuan Gong, Xingyu Ma, Jialiang Guo, Wenmei Li, Chenxuan Wang, Qiuxiang Ou, Sha Wang, Haimeng Tang, Shuqin Jia. Comparison of somatic variations between circulating tumor DNA and paired tissue in , pan-cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1956.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
Peking University (CN), Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.