Abstract 4501: Temporal Validation of Novel Therapeutic Targets in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Abstract In 2024, we reported the development of knowledge graph machine learning (KGML) models focused on 41 blood cancers (1), using several public resources. Our disclosure identified 19 drug targets that are likely to be druggable and fall into the "Tchem" category—that is, targets perturbed by small molecules (2). These 19 genes had limited or no known blood cancer associations, when evaluated via the DISEASES platform (3). Upon re-evaluation a year later, five genes (BLK, FCER2, FRK, CAMK2D, and EPHB1) were no longer investigated due to a growing body of literature. Of the remaining 14 genes (see Table 1), only two (IRAK3 and ITPKB) have marginally relevant associations with lymphoma, leukemia, or myeloma, according to the DISEASES platform (3). Table 1 summarizes cytotoxicity assays for the 14 targets, using compounds specific for each target. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines were: Toledo (CL1), SU-DHL-6 (CL2), TMD8 (CL3), and JeKo-1 (CL4). CC50 (50% cytotoxic concentration) values, measured in micromolar concentrations, were collected at 3 (_3d) and 7 days (_7d), respectively; "nd" - not determined; "gt" - greater than value. Except for GRM8, all targets exhibited at least one micromolar CC50 value. Five kinases (IRAK3, ITPKB, PRKCE, ACVR2B, and PIM1), one enzyme (ADCY1), and one ion channel (TRPV4) have at least one sub-micromolar CC50 value (25 values total). Some targets (e.g., GPR18, a G-protein coupled receptor; and ITPKB, a kinase) show low micromolar CC50s at 7 days, with gt 20 CC50 after 3 days, suggesting target engagement. Confirmatory target engagement experiments are in progress. Although preliminary, these data validate our KGML approach (1), as they implicate at least seven targets in non-Hodgkin lymphoma disease biology, with potentially novel therapeutic applications. References 1. Quazi M, et al. Cancer Res (2024) 84 (6_Supplement): 3535. 2. Oprea TI, et al. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2018) 17:317-32. 3. Grissa D, et al. Database (2022) baac019. Citation Format: Tudor I. Oprea, Mohammed Quazi, Suman Sirimulla, Cristian G. Bologa, Ruben Karapetian, Alexey Pushechnikov, Bill Farley, Nikolay Savchuk. Temporal Validation of Novel Therapeutic Targets in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4501.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-4501
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4501: Temporal Validation of Novel Therapeutic Targets in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Nikolay Savchuk, B F Farley, Рубен Карапетян, Cristian Bologa et al.
Cancer Research
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Abstract 4501: Temporal Validation of Novel Therapeutic Targets in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Nikolay Savchuk, B F Farley, Рубен Карапетян, Cristian Bologa, Suman Sirimulla, Tudor I. Oprea, Mohammed A. Quazi, Alexey Pushechnikov
article en

Abstract

Abstract In 2024, we reported the development of knowledge graph machine learning (KGML) models focused on 41 blood cancers (1), using several public resources. Our disclosure identified 19 drug targets that are likely to be druggable and fall into the "Tchem" category—that is, targets perturbed by small molecules (2). These 19 genes had limited or no known blood cancer associations, when evaluated via the DISEASES platform (3). Upon re-evaluation a year later, five genes (BLK, FCER2, FRK, CAMK2D, and EPHB1) were no longer investigated due to a growing body of literature. Of the remaining 14 genes (see Table 1), only two (IRAK3 and ITPKB) have marginally relevant associations with lymphoma, leukemia, or myeloma, according to the DISEASES platform (3). Table 1 summarizes cytotoxicity assays for the 14 targets, using compounds specific for each target. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines were: Toledo (CL1), SU-DHL-6 (CL2), TMD8 (CL3), and JeKo-1 (CL4). CC50 (50% cytotoxic concentration) values, measured in micromolar concentrations, were collected at 3 (_3d) and 7 days (_7d), respectively; "nd" - not determined; "gt" - greater than value. Except for GRM8, all targets exhibited at least one micromolar CC50 value. Five kinases (IRAK3, ITPKB, PRKCE, ACVR2B, and PIM1), one enzyme (ADCY1), and one ion channel (TRPV4) have at least one sub-micromolar CC50 value (25 values total). Some targets (e.g., GPR18, a G-protein coupled receptor; and ITPKB, a kinase) show low micromolar CC50s at 7 days, with gt 20 CC50 after 3 days, suggesting target engagement. Confirmatory target engagement experiments are in progress. Although preliminary, these data validate our KGML approach (1), as they implicate at least seven targets in non-Hodgkin lymphoma disease biology, with potentially novel therapeutic applications. References 1. Quazi M, et al. Cancer Res (2024) 84 (6_Supplement): 3535. 2. Oprea TI, et al. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2018) 17:317-32. 3. Grissa D, et al. Database (2022) baac019. Citation Format: Tudor I. Oprea, Mohammed Quazi, Suman Sirimulla, Cristian G. Bologa, Ruben Karapetian, Alexey Pushechnikov, Bill Farley, Nikolay Savchuk. Temporal Validation of Novel Therapeutic Targets in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4501.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
University of New Mexico (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.