THE EPIC AND HEDONISM: SOCIALIST CULTURE, CLASS EROS, AND BIOPOLITICS IN THE MARXIST CRITICISM OF VOLODYMYR YURYNETS

The paper examines the concept of socialist culture of the Ukrainian philosopher Volodymyr Yurynets in the context of the debates of the 1920s on the nature of ‘proletarian culture.’ With the consolidation of the principle of the ideological party character of literature, the concept of ‘proletarian culture,’ which implicitly referred to the class idea and the proletarian world revolution, was replaced by the thesis of socialist culture, the main idea of which should be socialist construction. Yurynets’ theory of socialist culture has a biopolitical character and is based on the communist illusion that in the future human beings and the secondary social nature, as products of labor, will not be alienated but will become the same. Yurynets sees the meaning of modern culture in the “discovery of the living forces of the epoch,” that is, its humanistic potential. Among the possible forms of socialist literature, he distinguishes between stoic and hedonistic. According to Yurynets, stoic culture reflects labor and, accordingly, its content is “the competition between man and nature.” This culture is restrained in its methods, cyclical, and determined by the rhythm of collective work. New achievements in science and technology are the source of genetic development. In general, Yurynets focuses the stoic cultural consciousness on the human being’s enthusiasm for the conquest of nature. According to Yurynets, in the depths of stoic culture another type of culture will be born: hedonistic. Part of this culture will be the production of everyday objects, comfort, and individual consumption. The hedonistic culture will revive ‘cheerful laughter,’ which will exist to provide relaxation for a tired person, i.e., it will have primarily a physiological purpose. The hedonistic form of culture resembles the theory of mass culture, which V. Yurynets interprets in the vein of psychology and reflexology. Hedonistic culture serves as a form of collective creativity, intended for rest from work and restoration of the sensory organs. The emphasis on cosmism and everyday life makes the theory of socialist culture similar to the theory of pan-art (total art). Yurynets’ concept of culture, based on futuristic and cosmic visions of the struggle between man and nature, resembles socialist utopias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Академічний журнал Слово і Час
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33608/0236-1477.2025.02.52-70
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE EPIC AND HEDONISM: SOCIALIST CULTURE, CLASS EROS, AND BIOPOLITICS IN THE MARXIST CRITICISM OF VOLODYMYR YURYNETS

Tamara Hundorova
Академічний журнал Слово і Час
Soviet and Russian History
article

THE EPIC AND HEDONISM: SOCIALIST CULTURE, CLASS EROS, AND BIOPOLITICS IN THE MARXIST CRITICISM OF VOLODYMYR YURYNETS

Tamara Hundorova
article en

Abstract

The paper examines the concept of socialist culture of the Ukrainian philosopher Volodymyr Yurynets in the context of the debates of the 1920s on the nature of ‘proletarian culture.’ With the consolidation of the principle of the ideological party character of literature, the concept of ‘proletarian culture,’ which implicitly referred to the class idea and the proletarian world revolution, was replaced by the thesis of socialist culture, the main idea of which should be socialist construction. Yurynets’ theory of socialist culture has a biopolitical character and is based on the communist illusion that in the future human beings and the secondary social nature, as products of labor, will not be alienated but will become the same. Yurynets sees the meaning of modern culture in the “discovery of the living forces of the epoch,” that is, its humanistic potential. Among the possible forms of socialist literature, he distinguishes between stoic and hedonistic. According to Yurynets, stoic culture reflects labor and, accordingly, its content is “the competition between man and nature.” This culture is restrained in its methods, cyclical, and determined by the rhythm of collective work. New achievements in science and technology are the source of genetic development. In general, Yurynets focuses the stoic cultural consciousness on the human being’s enthusiasm for the conquest of nature. According to Yurynets, in the depths of stoic culture another type of culture will be born: hedonistic. Part of this culture will be the production of everyday objects, comfort, and individual consumption. The hedonistic culture will revive ‘cheerful laughter,’ which will exist to provide relaxation for a tired person, i.e., it will have primarily a physiological purpose. The hedonistic form of culture resembles the theory of mass culture, which V. Yurynets interprets in the vein of psychology and reflexology. Hedonistic culture serves as a form of collective creativity, intended for rest from work and restoration of the sensory organs. The emphasis on cosmism and everyday life makes the theory of socialist culture similar to the theory of pan-art (total art). Yurynets’ concept of culture, based on futuristic and cosmic visions of the struggle between man and nature, resembles socialist utopias.

Академічний журнал Слово і Час(2)
Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.