Identifying air quality monitoring deserts in the United States

Air quality is associated with adverse health outcomes and mortality risk. While most research has focused on the association between air quality estimates and these outcomes, little is known about the presence of air quality monitoring sites across the United States or the place-level characteristics associated with such placements. We classify counties without a monitoring station as air quality monitoring deserts. Using the Environmental Protection Agency's AirData active sites directory, we determine the number and location of monitoring deserts. We then study whether demographic and socioeconomic characteristics are associated with the likelihood of a county being a monitoring desert. Our results indicate that 1,848 or 58.8% of US counties are an air quality monitoring desert, covering about 40% of the nation's land area. Our estimates suggest that more than 50 million people or 15.3% of the population live in air quality monitoring deserts. Rural and counties with higher proportions of historically minoritized groups have higher odds of being a monitoring desert. Regionally speaking, air quality monitoring deserts are highly concentrated within the Midwest and the South. These findings highlight gaps in air quality monitoring in the United States. Identifying and addressing air quality monitoring deserts across the United States will allow us to better understand air quality across the nation and expand current knowledge of its impact on national health and well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2425310122
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying air quality monitoring deserts in the United States

Nelson Roque, Alexis R. Santos‐Lozada, Hailey Andrews
4 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Air Quality and Health Impacts
4.80
article

Identifying air quality monitoring deserts in the United States

Nelson Roque, Alexis R. Santos‐Lozada, Hailey Andrews
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Air quality is associated with adverse health outcomes and mortality risk. While most research has focused on the association between air quality estimates and these outcomes, little is known about the presence of air quality monitoring sites across the United States or the place-level characteristics associated with such placements. We classify counties without a monitoring station as air quality monitoring deserts. Using the Environmental Protection Agency's AirData active sites directory, we determine the number and location of monitoring deserts. We then study whether demographic and socioeconomic characteristics are associated with the likelihood of a county being a monitoring desert. Our results indicate that 1,848 or 58.8% of US counties are an air quality monitoring desert, covering about 40% of the nation's land area. Our estimates suggest that more than 50 million people or 15.3% of the population live in air quality monitoring deserts. Rural and counties with higher proportions of historically minoritized groups have higher odds of being a monitoring desert. Regionally speaking, air quality monitoring deserts are highly concentrated within the Midwest and the South. These findings highlight gaps in air quality monitoring in the United States. Identifying and addressing air quality monitoring deserts across the United States will allow us to better understand air quality across the nation and expand current knowledge of its impact on national health and well-being.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(17)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
National Institute on Aging, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
4.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.