Computational analysis of 100 K choice dilemmas: Decision attributes, trade-off structures, and model-based prediction

We present a dataset of over 100 K textual descriptions of real-life choice dilemmas, obtained from social media posts and large-scale survey data. Using large language models (LLMs), we extract hundreds of choice attributes at play in these dilemmas and map them onto a common representational space. This representation allows us to quantify the broader themes and specific trade-offs inherent in life choices and analyze how they vary across different contexts. We also present our dilemmas to human participants and find that our LLM pipeline, when combined with established decision models, accurately predicts people's choices, outperforming models based on unstructured textual content, demographics, and personality. In this way, our research provides insights into the attributes, outcomes, and goals that underpin life choices, and shows how large-scale LLM-based structure extraction can be used in combination with existing scientific theory to study complex real-world human behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2406489122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational analysis of 100 K choice dilemmas: Decision attributes, trade-off structures, and model-based prediction

Feiyi Wang, Simon Thomas van Baal, Sudeep Bhatia, Lukasz Walasek
1 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
2.48
article

Computational analysis of 100 K choice dilemmas: Decision attributes, trade-off structures, and model-based prediction

Feiyi Wang, Simon Thomas van Baal, Sudeep Bhatia, Lukasz Walasek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We present a dataset of over 100 K textual descriptions of real-life choice dilemmas, obtained from social media posts and large-scale survey data. Using large language models (LLMs), we extract hundreds of choice attributes at play in these dilemmas and map them onto a common representational space. This representation allows us to quantify the broader themes and specific trade-offs inherent in life choices and analyze how they vary across different contexts. We also present our dilemmas to human participants and find that our LLM pipeline, when combined with established decision models, accurately predicts people's choices, outperforming models based on unstructured textual content, demographics, and personality. In this way, our research provides insights into the attributes, outcomes, and goals that underpin life choices, and shows how large-scale LLM-based structure extraction can be used in combination with existing scientific theory to study complex real-world human behavior.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(17)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Computational analysis of 100 K choice dilemmas: Decision attributes, trade-off structures, and model-based prediction — Feiyi Wang, Simon Thomas van Baal, et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS