Abstract 7433: Predicting overall survival (OS) differences using longitudinal AI-driven imaging-based prognostication (IPRO) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)

Abstract Background: Early prediction of overall survival benefit associated with cancer treatments remains a key challenge in clinical trials and patient care. Standardized measures such as the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1 are used in clinical trials to define tumour response and progression, but are subject to inter- and intra-observer variability, and are infrequently used in day to day clinical practice. Imaging-based prognostication delta (IPRO-Δ) is an artificial intelligence system trained on longitudinal changes in rich features extracted from serial real-world imaging data, automatically predicting survival from pairs of baseline (BL) and follow up (FU) thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: IPRO-Δ was evaluated in an external real-world dataset of 194 aNSCLC patients treated with first line systemic therapy at 17 cancer centers, with pretreatment BL and FU (8±4 weeks after treatment initiation) scans. IPRO-Δ generated survival predictions at week 8 for each patient. Kaplan-Meier analyses and hazard ratios (HR) evaluated the association of IPRO-Δ quartiles with OS, with the highest quartile representing progressive disease, the lowest treatment response, and the middle stable disease. Results: The cohort included 19 stage IIIB (9.8%) and 175 stage IV (90.2%) aNSCLC patients, with 94 females (48.5%) and a median age of 64 years. Most tumours were adenocarcinoma (n = 147, 75.8%), followed by squamous cell (n = 18, 9.3%), large cell (n = 5, 2.6%) and other histologies (n = 24, 12.4%). Table 1 shows survival stratification amongst IPRO-Δ quartiles for the overall population and the subgroup of EGFR+ patients. Conclusion: IPRO-Δ successfully predicted survival differences amongst aNSCLC patients using BL and week-8 CT scans. Future work will compare IPRO-Δ to RECIST v1.1, potentially leading to IPRO-Δ's use as a surrogate endpoint in aNSCLC trials. Citation Format: Mohammed A. Alvi, John Riskas, Shahid A. Haider, Vignesh Sivan, Oleksandra Samorodova, Jay Hennesy, Duoaud Shah, Felix Baldauf-Lenschen, Marina Salluzzi, Ronald Bridges, Omar F. Khan. Predicting overall survival (OS) differences using longitudinal AI-driven imaging-based prognostication (IPRO) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 7433.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-7433
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 7433: Predicting overall survival (OS) differences using longitudinal AI-driven imaging-based prognostication (IPRO) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)

Omar Khan, Marina Salluzzi, Vignesh Sivan, Shahid A. Haider et al.
Cancer Research
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Abstract 7433: Predicting overall survival (OS) differences using longitudinal AI-driven imaging-based prognostication (IPRO) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)

Omar Khan, Marina Salluzzi, Vignesh Sivan, Shahid A. Haider, Mohammed Ali Alvi, Oleksandra Samorodova, Ronald Bridges, Felix Baldauf-Lenschen, J. Riskas, Dhiraj M. Shah, Jay Hennesy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Early prediction of overall survival benefit associated with cancer treatments remains a key challenge in clinical trials and patient care. Standardized measures such as the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1 are used in clinical trials to define tumour response and progression, but are subject to inter- and intra-observer variability, and are infrequently used in day to day clinical practice. Imaging-based prognostication delta (IPRO-Δ) is an artificial intelligence system trained on longitudinal changes in rich features extracted from serial real-world imaging data, automatically predicting survival from pairs of baseline (BL) and follow up (FU) thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: IPRO-Δ was evaluated in an external real-world dataset of 194 aNSCLC patients treated with first line systemic therapy at 17 cancer centers, with pretreatment BL and FU (8±4 weeks after treatment initiation) scans. IPRO-Δ generated survival predictions at week 8 for each patient. Kaplan-Meier analyses and hazard ratios (HR) evaluated the association of IPRO-Δ quartiles with OS, with the highest quartile representing progressive disease, the lowest treatment response, and the middle stable disease. Results: The cohort included 19 stage IIIB (9.8%) and 175 stage IV (90.2%) aNSCLC patients, with 94 females (48.5%) and a median age of 64 years. Most tumours were adenocarcinoma (n = 147, 75.8%), followed by squamous cell (n = 18, 9.3%), large cell (n = 5, 2.6%) and other histologies (n = 24, 12.4%). Table 1 shows survival stratification amongst IPRO-Δ quartiles for the overall population and the subgroup of EGFR+ patients. Conclusion: IPRO-Δ successfully predicted survival differences amongst aNSCLC patients using BL and week-8 CT scans. Future work will compare IPRO-Δ to RECIST v1.1, potentially leading to IPRO-Δ's use as a surrogate endpoint in aNSCLC trials. Citation Format: Mohammed A. Alvi, John Riskas, Shahid A. Haider, Vignesh Sivan, Oleksandra Samorodova, Jay Hennesy, Duoaud Shah, Felix Baldauf-Lenschen, Marina Salluzzi, Ronald Bridges, Omar F. Khan. Predicting overall survival (OS) differences using longitudinal AI-driven imaging-based prognostication (IPRO) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 7433.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
University of Calgary (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.