Explicit and implicit (automatized) knowledge of second language pronunciation: Implications for theory, research, and classroom practice

Abstract Although the distinction between explicit and implicit (automatized) knowledge of second or foreign language (L2) is of crucial importance to second language acquisition (SLA) theory and research, it has thus far not been directly applied to L2 pronunciation. The paper attempts to fill this gap by making an initial attempt to illustrate the relevance of this vital distinction in this area. Following the discussion of some crucial preliminary issues, the two types of knowledge are characterized and challenges involved in their measurement are considered. Subsequently, the distinction is related to theoretical accounts of how L2 pronunciation is learnt and empirical investigations into the effectiveness of different types of pronunciation instruction as well as everyday instructional classroom practices. The role of mediating factors, such as individual differences or contextual influences, is also considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foreign Language Annals
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12803
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explicit and implicit (automatized) knowledge of second language pronunciation: Implications for theory, research, and classroom practice

Mirosław Pawlak
Foreign Language Annals
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Explicit and implicit (automatized) knowledge of second language pronunciation: Implications for theory, research, and classroom practice

Mirosław Pawlak
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although the distinction between explicit and implicit (automatized) knowledge of second or foreign language (L2) is of crucial importance to second language acquisition (SLA) theory and research, it has thus far not been directly applied to L2 pronunciation. The paper attempts to fill this gap by making an initial attempt to illustrate the relevance of this vital distinction in this area. Following the discussion of some crucial preliminary issues, the two types of knowledge are characterized and challenges involved in their measurement are considered. Subsequently, the distinction is related to theoretical accounts of how L2 pronunciation is learnt and empirical investigations into the effectiveness of different types of pronunciation instruction as well as everyday instructional classroom practices. The role of mediating factors, such as individual differences or contextual influences, is also considered.

Foreign Language AnnalsVol. 58(2)
State University of Applied Sciences in Konin (PL), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.