Comparison of Revision Rates Among Patients Undergoing 2-Level ACDF, CDR, and Hybrid Constructs
In this retrospective database study of patients 65 years old or younger undergoing 2-level anterior cervical surgery, there were no significant differences at 5-year follow-up in revision rates for patients undergoing 2-level CDR, 2-level ACDF, and hybrid ACDF/CDR surgeries. In subanalysis, patients specifically with a plated hybrid ACDF/CDR had a higher occurrence of revision versus those undergoing plated 2-level ACDF or 2-level CDR. Future multicenter, prospective research is necessary to further assess these findings.
Authors
- Amit Kumar Jain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-3365)
- Sathish Muthu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7143-4354)
- Wesley M. Durand (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1743-7693)
- Zorica Buser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5680-0643)
- Philip K. Louie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4787-1538)
- Samuel Kang-Wook Cho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7511-2486)
- S. Tim Yoon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1010-6952)
- Yesha Parekh
- Sang Hun Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5942-8309)
- Dan Riew
Institutions
- Virginia Mason Medical Center (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Center for Neurosciences (US)
- Government Medical College and Hospital (IN)
- Neurological Surgery (US)
- New York University (US)
- Karpagam Academy of Higher Education (IN)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
- Published
- 2025-04-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000001811
- Primary Topic
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00