Agile Effort Estimation Improved by Feature Selection and Model Explainability

Agile methodologies are widely adopted in the industry, with iterative development being a common practice. However, this approach introduces certain risks in controlling and managing the planned scope for delivery at the end of each iteration. Previous studies have proposed machine learning methods to predict the likelihood of meeting this committed scope, using models trained on features extracted from prior iterations and their associated tasks. A crucial aspect of any predictive model is user trust, which depends on the model’s explainability. However, an excessive number of features can complicate interpretation. In this work, we propose feature subset selection methods to reduce the number of features without compromising model performance.To ensure interpretability, we leverage state-of-the-art explainability techniques to analyze the key features driving model predictions. Our evaluation, conducted on five large open-source projects from prior studies, demonstrates successful feature subset selection, reducing the feature set to 10% of its original size without any loss in predictive performance. Using explainability tools, we provide a synthesis of the features with the most significant impact on iteration performance predictions across agile projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5220/0013229800003928
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agile Effort Estimation Improved by Feature Selection and Model Explainability

Víctor Pérez-Piqueras, José Antonio Gámez, Pablo Bermejo López
Software Engineering Research
article

Agile Effort Estimation Improved by Feature Selection and Model Explainability

Víctor Pérez-Piqueras, José Antonio Gámez, Pablo Bermejo López
article en

Abstract

Agile methodologies are widely adopted in the industry, with iterative development being a common practice. However, this approach introduces certain risks in controlling and managing the planned scope for delivery at the end of each iteration. Previous studies have proposed machine learning methods to predict the likelihood of meeting this committed scope, using models trained on features extracted from prior iterations and their associated tasks. A crucial aspect of any predictive model is user trust, which depends on the model’s explainability. However, an excessive number of features can complicate interpretation. In this work, we propose feature subset selection methods to reduce the number of features without compromising model performance.To ensure interpretability, we leverage state-of-the-art explainability techniques to analyze the key features driving model predictions. Our evaluation, conducted on five large open-source projects from prior studies, demonstrates successful feature subset selection, reducing the feature set to 10% of its original size without any loss in predictive performance. Using explainability tools, we provide a synthesis of the features with the most significant impact on iteration performance predictions across agile projects.

University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Agile Effort Estimation Improved by Feature Selection and Model Explainability — Víctor Pérez-Piqueras, José Antonio Gámez, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS