Theoretical and Legal Aspects of Judicial Integrity: Questions of Updated Methodological Approaches

The presented article is devoted to the theoretical and legal study of the problem of the integrity of judges through the analysis of the issue of updating methodological approaches to the normative regulation of a certain issue. It is motivated that the principle of integrity is an axiological attribute of public authorities and the judicial system in particular. The need for a mechanism for legal assurance of the integrity of judges is due to a number of ontological circumstances in which our state finds itself: the European direction of reforming legal practice and legislation; reforming the judicial system; overcoming public distrust of public authorities in general and the judiciary in particular. The inappropriate legal policy that has developed in our state regarding the lack of understanding of the integrity of judges is criticized, since linguistically this concept is derived from the understanding of honesty as a characteristic that should be inherent in members of society when they perform their lawful functions. This work also proves that the proposed understanding of integrity as a principle of civil service by the norm-maker does not correspond to the modern representation of the elemental composition of the studied concept and to European standards of the formation and functioning of the legal system due to the single-vector understanding of the concept and the absence of a clear methodology for measuring the concept. It is motivated that in the praxeological sense this category acquires an expanded meaning, in addition to the usual interpretation of honesty, it includes a number of elements: responsibility, objectivity, professionalism, impartiality and good faith. The author proves that integrity in the measurement of the axiological nature of the intentions of the state mechanism is not just a professional standard, but an ontological requirement for a judge as a subject responsible for maintaining a balance between legal normativity and ethical duty to society. In general, the studied element acts as a conceptual support for the combination of the “letter” and “spirit” of the law, forming a space in which legal reality meets the criteria of justice, freedom and equality of subjects of law. A substantiated sectoral approach in legislative techniques to the definition of the concept of integrity, where the integrity of individual representatives of public authorities is interpreted depending on the specifics of their powers. The author’s definition of the concept of integrity of judges is presented. Keywords: integrity of judges, principles of law, right to a fair trial, judicial system, public authorities, rule of law, theoretical understanding, combating corruption, methodological approaches, legal regulation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika» Seria Uridicni nauki
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23939/law2025.45.093
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theoretical and Legal Aspects of Judicial Integrity: Questions of Updated Methodological Approaches

Vitaliy Kovalchuk
Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika» Seria Uridicni nauki
Legal and Policy Issues
article

Theoretical and Legal Aspects of Judicial Integrity: Questions of Updated Methodological Approaches

Vitaliy Kovalchuk
article en

Abstract

The presented article is devoted to the theoretical and legal study of the problem of the integrity of judges through the analysis of the issue of updating methodological approaches to the normative regulation of a certain issue. It is motivated that the principle of integrity is an axiological attribute of public authorities and the judicial system in particular. The need for a mechanism for legal assurance of the integrity of judges is due to a number of ontological circumstances in which our state finds itself: the European direction of reforming legal practice and legislation; reforming the judicial system; overcoming public distrust of public authorities in general and the judiciary in particular. The inappropriate legal policy that has developed in our state regarding the lack of understanding of the integrity of judges is criticized, since linguistically this concept is derived from the understanding of honesty as a characteristic that should be inherent in members of society when they perform their lawful functions. This work also proves that the proposed understanding of integrity as a principle of civil service by the norm-maker does not correspond to the modern representation of the elemental composition of the studied concept and to European standards of the formation and functioning of the legal system due to the single-vector understanding of the concept and the absence of a clear methodology for measuring the concept. It is motivated that in the praxeological sense this category acquires an expanded meaning, in addition to the usual interpretation of honesty, it includes a number of elements: responsibility, objectivity, professionalism, impartiality and good faith. The author proves that integrity in the measurement of the axiological nature of the intentions of the state mechanism is not just a professional standard, but an ontological requirement for a judge as a subject responsible for maintaining a balance between legal normativity and ethical duty to society. In general, the studied element acts as a conceptual support for the combination of the “letter” and “spirit” of the law, forming a space in which legal reality meets the criteria of justice, freedom and equality of subjects of law. A substantiated sectoral approach in legislative techniques to the definition of the concept of integrity, where the integrity of individual representatives of public authorities is interpreted depending on the specifics of their powers. The author’s definition of the concept of integrity of judges is presented. Keywords: integrity of judges, principles of law, right to a fair trial, judicial system, public authorities, rule of law, theoretical understanding, combating corruption, methodological approaches, legal regulation.

Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika» Seria Uridicni naukiVol. 12(45)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Legal and Policy Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.