An automated protocol for filter processing of strong‐motion records: Case study in China

A new earthquake early warning network with over 15,000 stations in China generates a large volume of strong‐motion records annually, making manual processing inefficient and subjective. This study presents an automated method for selecting the high‐pass filter cut‐off frequency ( f HP ) for Chinese strong‐motion records, based on manually processed data from 2008 to 2020. The study highlights the importance of considering the time‐domain responses of causal and acausal filters when assessing filtering results and introduces rational constraints to optimize f HP selection across different magnitudes and epicentral distances. While effective for most records, manual selection remains necessary for cases with significant surface waves. To evaluate its performance, the method was compared with the method proposed by Ramos‐Sepulveda et al. and applied to datasets from China, CESMD (U.S.), K‐NET and KiK‐net (Japan), and ESM (Europe). Results show that the proposed method improves the consistency of f HP selection and retains more seismic signal information compared to existing methods. However, regional variations in noise characteristics and manual selection criteria influence the outcomes, highlighting the need for careful application. By enhancing the efficiency and reliability of strong‐motion data processing, this study supports more accurate seismic analyses and earthquake hazard assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Spectra
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930251332269
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An automated protocol for filter processing of strong‐motion records: Case study in China

Tadahiro Kishida, Yefei Ren, W. -X. Guo, Xinxin Yao et al.
1 citations
Earthquake Spectra
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.95
article

An automated protocol for filter processing of strong‐motion records: Case study in China

Tadahiro Kishida, Yefei Ren, W. -X. Guo, Xinxin Yao, Ye Liu, Ruizhi Wen, Hongwei Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A new earthquake early warning network with over 15,000 stations in China generates a large volume of strong‐motion records annually, making manual processing inefficient and subjective. This study presents an automated method for selecting the high‐pass filter cut‐off frequency ( f HP ) for Chinese strong‐motion records, based on manually processed data from 2008 to 2020. The study highlights the importance of considering the time‐domain responses of causal and acausal filters when assessing filtering results and introduces rational constraints to optimize f HP selection across different magnitudes and epicentral distances. While effective for most records, manual selection remains necessary for cases with significant surface waves. To evaluate its performance, the method was compared with the method proposed by Ramos‐Sepulveda et al. and applied to datasets from China, CESMD (U.S.), K‐NET and KiK‐net (Japan), and ESM (Europe). Results show that the proposed method improves the consistency of f HP selection and retains more seismic signal information compared to existing methods. However, regional variations in noise characteristics and manual selection criteria influence the outcomes, highlighting the need for careful application. By enhancing the efficiency and reliability of strong‐motion data processing, this study supports more accurate seismic analyses and earthquake hazard assessments.

Earthquake SpectraVol. 41(3)
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), Jilin Jianzhu University (CN), China Earthquake Administration (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.