Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning: A Comparative Study of Techniques and their Practical Implementations

Abstract: Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a revolutionary solution to decentralized machine learning that provides model training over many clients without sharing raw data. Still, privacy threats continue to be a significant challenge because of possible loopholes in data aggregation, adversarial attacks, and communication schemes [1]. This article critically compares some of the privacy-preserving methods applied in FL, such as differential privacy, secure multi-party computation, homomorphic encryption, clustered sampling, and robust aggregation. By considering their efficacy, computational overheads, and trade-offs between model utility and privacy, this research identifies important advantages and shortcomings of each approach. Additionally, the paper delves into open challenges and outlines future directions for research to improve privacy in FL, especially in edge computing and 6G-enabled IoT settings

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.69141
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning: A Comparative Study of Techniques and their Practical Implementations

Sunil Chouhan, Maitri Waghmare, Komal Bhosale, Ms. Kajal Kamble
1 citations
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
article

Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning: A Comparative Study of Techniques and their Practical Implementations

Sunil Chouhan, Maitri Waghmare, Komal Bhosale, Ms. Kajal Kamble
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a revolutionary solution to decentralized machine learning that provides model training over many clients without sharing raw data. Still, privacy threats continue to be a significant challenge because of possible loopholes in data aggregation, adversarial attacks, and communication schemes [1]. This article critically compares some of the privacy-preserving methods applied in FL, such as differential privacy, secure multi-party computation, homomorphic encryption, clustered sampling, and robust aggregation. By considering their efficacy, computational overheads, and trade-offs between model utility and privacy, this research identifies important advantages and shortcomings of each approach. Additionally, the paper delves into open challenges and outlines future directions for research to improve privacy in FL, especially in edge computing and 6G-enabled IoT settings

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologyVol. 13(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.