Abstract 5034: Comparative whole genome sequencing between matched cryopreserved and FFPE tumor samples

Background & Aims: Next generation sequencing, specifically whole genome sequencing (WGS), plays a key role in precision medicine. Currently, the main source of cancer biospecimens for WGS is formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. This is partly because cryopreserved (CP) tissues have not been routinely stored in real-world clinical settings. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of WGS by using matched CP and FFPE samples. We hypothesized that CP samples would demonstrate superior quality metrics before and after sequencing the DNA. Methods: A total of 50 matched pairs of CP and FFPE tumor samples were obtained from patients with various types of cancers, primarily representing gynecological cancers. DNA was extracted and quality and quantity were determined. WGS was performed using 200 ng of DNA extracted from each sample. We conducted a comparison between CP and FFPE samples in terms of the sequencing quality control metrics and the number of identified variants. Results: Our samples consisted of 18 ovary, 5 liver, 6 kidney, 7 uterus, 4 colon, and 10 other cancers. Metrics were obtained before sequencing, and it was found that gDNA concentration in ng/ul was significantly higher in CP (85.2) than FFPE (12.5) tissue. Additionally, DIN number (FFPE: 4.7; CP: 8.4) and fragment size in base pairs (FFPE: 444.1; CP: 644.6) were also significantly higher in CP tissue. WGS was then performed, and it was found that both mean read depth (FFPE: 34.6; CP: 54.2) and insert size (FFPE: 243.6 CP: 365.7) were significantly higher in CP than FFPE tissues. The percentage mapped over 15x was similar and not statistically different with FFPE being 99.3% and CP being 99.7%. To determine concordance between the matched samples, 94,147 variants were found in FFPE, and 80,036 variants were found in CP. The median point mutation overlap (VAP>=5.0%) was used to find a concordance percentage, with that being 43.5% between FFPE and CP tissues (shared: 51,619; FFPE: 38,690; CP:28,434). Tumer mutation burden was determined on 8 samples because germ line sequencing was performed on available blood samples. FFPE had a TMB of 13.7 and CP exhibited a TMB of 6.4, demonstrating a statistical difference with a p-value = 0.02. Lastly, structural variance was evaluated and FFPE averaged 21 and CP averaged 38. Conclusion: WGS utilizing CP samples provides superior quality indices compared to FFPE samples. Despite matched samples, there was significant discordance in variants identified in the cancers. Therefore, CP sample collection should be prioritized when performing WGS. Citation Format: Paytin Curran, DeLaney Anderson, Jeffrey Okojie, Ryan Miller, Sangmoon Lee, Ken Dixon, Jared James Barrott. Comparative whole genome sequencing between matched cryopreserved and FFPE tumor samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 5034.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-5034
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 5034: Comparative whole genome sequencing between matched cryopreserved and FFPE tumor samples

Ryan S. Miller, Jared J. Barrott, Paul J. Curran, Jeffrey Okojie et al.
Cancer Research
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 5034: Comparative whole genome sequencing between matched cryopreserved and FFPE tumor samples

Ryan S. Miller, Jared J. Barrott, Paul J. Curran, Jeffrey Okojie, Sangmoon Lee, Ken Dixon, D. Anderson
article en

Abstract

Background & Aims: Next generation sequencing, specifically whole genome sequencing (WGS), plays a key role in precision medicine. Currently, the main source of cancer biospecimens for WGS is formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. This is partly because cryopreserved (CP) tissues have not been routinely stored in real-world clinical settings. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of WGS by using matched CP and FFPE samples. We hypothesized that CP samples would demonstrate superior quality metrics before and after sequencing the DNA. Methods: A total of 50 matched pairs of CP and FFPE tumor samples were obtained from patients with various types of cancers, primarily representing gynecological cancers. DNA was extracted and quality and quantity were determined. WGS was performed using 200 ng of DNA extracted from each sample. We conducted a comparison between CP and FFPE samples in terms of the sequencing quality control metrics and the number of identified variants. Results: Our samples consisted of 18 ovary, 5 liver, 6 kidney, 7 uterus, 4 colon, and 10 other cancers. Metrics were obtained before sequencing, and it was found that gDNA concentration in ng/ul was significantly higher in CP (85.2) than FFPE (12.5) tissue. Additionally, DIN number (FFPE: 4.7; CP: 8.4) and fragment size in base pairs (FFPE: 444.1; CP: 644.6) were also significantly higher in CP tissue. WGS was then performed, and it was found that both mean read depth (FFPE: 34.6; CP: 54.2) and insert size (FFPE: 243.6 CP: 365.7) were significantly higher in CP than FFPE tissues. The percentage mapped over 15x was similar and not statistically different with FFPE being 99.3% and CP being 99.7%. To determine concordance between the matched samples, 94,147 variants were found in FFPE, and 80,036 variants were found in CP. The median point mutation overlap (VAP>=5.0%) was used to find a concordance percentage, with that being 43.5% between FFPE and CP tissues (shared: 51,619; FFPE: 38,690; CP:28,434). Tumer mutation burden was determined on 8 samples because germ line sequencing was performed on available blood samples. FFPE had a TMB of 13.7 and CP exhibited a TMB of 6.4, demonstrating a statistical difference with a p-value = 0.02. Lastly, structural variance was evaluated and FFPE averaged 21 and CP averaged 38. Conclusion: WGS utilizing CP samples provides superior quality indices compared to FFPE samples. Despite matched samples, there was significant discordance in variants identified in the cancers. Therefore, CP sample collection should be prioritized when performing WGS. Citation Format: Paytin Curran, DeLaney Anderson, Jeffrey Okojie, Ryan Miller, Sangmoon Lee, Ken Dixon, Jared James Barrott. Comparative whole genome sequencing between matched cryopreserved and FFPE tumor samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 5034.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
Brigham Young University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.