Numerical investigations of liquid–liquid extraction through a coiled tube integrated with an extraction outlet

This study numerically investigates the extraction of two immiscible liquids through coiled tubes integrated with an extraction outlet. Assuming a fully mixed initial state, representing the worst-case scenario, the research explores optimal conditions for achieving pure extraction of each liquid through different outlets. Two laminar Reynolds numbers of 225 and 563, along with seven different outlet split ratios, were analyzed for horizontal-axis coiled tubes. The effects of geometrical parameters and flow conditions on extraction efficiency were examined. For an inlet amine volume fraction of 50%, the results indicate that optimal extraction occurs at a split ratio of 0.5, with enhanced performance at Re = 563 compared to Re = 225. Sharp-edged, constant-diameter extraction tubes outperformed rounded and nozzle-type configurations while reducing the extraction tube diameter diminished the efficiency. Furthermore, an extraction at a coil angle of 675° (2 turns minus 45°) provided better efficiency compared to 765° (2 turns plus 45°). It is therefore recommended to operate near Re = 563, utilize a straight extraction tube with the same diameter as the coiled tube, and employ a sharp-edged connection at a coil angle of 675°. The extraction split ratio should align with the inlet rate of the lighter phase. • Numerical study of liquid–liquid extraction in coiled tubes with extraction outlet. • Analysis of laminar flow under various conditions and extraction tube geometries. • Optimal extraction with a straight tube matching the coiled tube’s diameter. • Best extraction achieved with a sharp-edged connection at a 675°coil angle. • Extraction split ratio should align with the lighter phase’s inlet rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2025.110310
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical investigations of liquid–liquid extraction through a coiled tube integrated with an extraction outlet

Michael Mansour, Katharina Zähringer, Abouelmagd H. Abdelsamie, Dominique Thévenin et al.
1 citations
Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
0.67
article

Numerical investigations of liquid–liquid extraction through a coiled tube integrated with an extraction outlet

Michael Mansour, Katharina Zähringer, Abouelmagd H. Abdelsamie, Dominique Thévenin, Almoatasem-Bellah K. Abdelnaeem
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study numerically investigates the extraction of two immiscible liquids through coiled tubes integrated with an extraction outlet. Assuming a fully mixed initial state, representing the worst-case scenario, the research explores optimal conditions for achieving pure extraction of each liquid through different outlets. Two laminar Reynolds numbers of 225 and 563, along with seven different outlet split ratios, were analyzed for horizontal-axis coiled tubes. The effects of geometrical parameters and flow conditions on extraction efficiency were examined. For an inlet amine volume fraction of 50%, the results indicate that optimal extraction occurs at a split ratio of 0.5, with enhanced performance at Re = 563 compared to Re = 225. Sharp-edged, constant-diameter extraction tubes outperformed rounded and nozzle-type configurations while reducing the extraction tube diameter diminished the efficiency. Furthermore, an extraction at a coil angle of 675° (2 turns minus 45°) provided better efficiency compared to 765° (2 turns plus 45°). It is therefore recommended to operate near Re = 563, utilize a straight extraction tube with the same diameter as the coiled tube, and employ a sharp-edged connection at a coil angle of 675°. The extraction split ratio should align with the inlet rate of the lighter phase. • Numerical study of liquid–liquid extraction in coiled tubes with extraction outlet. • Analysis of laminar flow under various conditions and extraction tube geometries. • Optimal extraction with a straight tube matching the coiled tube’s diameter. • Best extraction achieved with a sharp-edged connection at a 675°coil angle. • Extraction split ratio should align with the lighter phase’s inlet rate.

Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process IntensificationVol. 213
Helwan University (EG), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.