Abstract 6358: Single cell transcriptional dynamics in the HCMI cancer model collection

Next generation cancer models, including organoids, neurospheres and cell lines, are significantly advancing our ability to study individual human tumors in vitro and to develop novel cancer therapeutics in settings that resemble in vivo conditions. However, recent questions have emerged as to the degree to which in vitro models may faithfully represent intra- and inter-patient cell state heterogeneity at the transcriptional level of single cells. The Human Cancer Models Initiative (HCMI), a global collaboration involving the NCI (NIH), Cancer Research UK, the Wellcome Sanger Institute and the Hubrecht Organoid Technology foundation, has generated a large repertoire of 665 patient-derived models of human cancers, including organoids, neurospheres and conditionally reprogrammed cells, with matching parental tumor and clinical annotations. We conducted a tumor-model fidelity analysis using bulk profiles from Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and RNA-seq and confirmed strong cell-state concordance between each model and its parental tumor across most HCMI tumor-model pairs, thus showcasing models’ ability to retain key genetic, transcriptional and epigenetic attributes of their parental tumors. However, our analysis also identified divergent features in a subset (<8%) of models, potentially resulting in a loss of fidelity and challenging their translational use. To identify whether this discordance might be driven by ex vivo adaptations or selective evolutionary pressures from in vitro culture, we profiled a representative subset (n=13 pairs) of glioblastoma (GBM, n=7) and pancreatic cancer (PAAD, n=6) tumor-model pairs using single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq). Analysis of 132,593 nuclei (tumors: 66,054; models: 66,539) identified outlier GBM models undergoing proneural-to-mesenchymal (PTM) transition and highlighted serum culture media as a major associated factor of this process. Additionally, we found that divergences in selected PAAD (72,688 nuclei: tumors: 30,254; models: 42,434) pairs were linked to the complete loss of the rich tumor microenvironment cells in the original tumors and the in vitro expansion of select malignant subpopulations, as identified by network-based analysis of VIPER-inferred protein activity profiles. The observed divergences suggest that in vitro culture conditions can occasionally drive cellular reprogramming and alter phenotypic fidelity, resulting in varying degrees of state-specific transitions. However, the majority of the models (even those classified as outliers) are preserved for state-frequency in cellular subpopulations between tumors and models, and most if not all of the cellular states found in the parental tumor, thus faithfully representing intra-tumor heterogeneity. Taken together, these findings highlight the translational potential of the HCMI model repository and its translational relevance as an invaluable tool to support precision oncology. Citation Format: Dina ElHarouni, Mushriq Al-Jazrawe, Seongmin Choi, Merve Dede, Toshinori Hinoue, Sean A. Misek, Heeju Noh, Luca Zanella, Moony Tseng, Hayley E. Francies, Priya Sridevi, Rachana Agarwal, Cindy W. Kyi, Julyann Perez-Mayoral, Megan J. Stine, Eva Tonsing-Carter, James M. Clinton, The HCMI Network, Peter W. Laird, Calvin J. Kuo, Olivier Elemento, David L. Spector, Andrew D. Cherniack, Kyle Elrott, Martin L. Ferguson, Rameen Beroukhim, Katherine A. Hoadley, Nicolas Robine, Andrew McPherson, Matthew J. Garnett, David A. Tuveson, Andrea Califano, Paul T. Spellman, Keith L. Ligon, Daniela S. Gerhard, Louis M. Staudt, Jesse Boehm. Single cell transcriptional dynamics in the HCMI cancer model collection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 6358.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-6358
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 6358: Single cell transcriptional dynamics in the HCMI cancer model collection

Moony Tseng, Katherine A. Hoadley, Luca Zanella, Merve Dede et al.
Cancer Research
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 6358: Single cell transcriptional dynamics in the HCMI cancer model collection

Moony Tseng, Katherine A. Hoadley, Luca Zanella, Merve Dede, Keith Lloyd Ligon, Jesse S. Boehm, Hayley E. Francies, Nicolas Robine, Peter W. Laird, Louis M. Staudt, Toshinori Hinoue, Cindy W. Kyi, Heeju Noh, Rachana Agarwal, Paul T. Spellman, Dina ElHarouni, Andrea Califano, Megan J. Stine, Martin L. Ferguson, Sean A. Misek, James M. Clinton, Calvin J. Kuo, Olivier Elemento, Matthew J. Garnett, Mushriq Al‐Jazrawe, Seongmin Choi, Julyann Pérez‐Mayoral, David A. Tuveson, David L. Spector, Eva Tonsing-Carter, Andrew D. Cherniack, Priya Sridevi, Andrew McPherson, Rameen Beroukhim, Daniela S. Gerhard, The HCMI Network, Kyle Elrott
article en

Abstract

Next generation cancer models, including organoids, neurospheres and cell lines, are significantly advancing our ability to study individual human tumors in vitro and to develop novel cancer therapeutics in settings that resemble in vivo conditions. However, recent questions have emerged as to the degree to which in vitro models may faithfully represent intra- and inter-patient cell state heterogeneity at the transcriptional level of single cells. The Human Cancer Models Initiative (HCMI), a global collaboration involving the NCI (NIH), Cancer Research UK, the Wellcome Sanger Institute and the Hubrecht Organoid Technology foundation, has generated a large repertoire of 665 patient-derived models of human cancers, including organoids, neurospheres and conditionally reprogrammed cells, with matching parental tumor and clinical annotations. We conducted a tumor-model fidelity analysis using bulk profiles from Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and RNA-seq and confirmed strong cell-state concordance between each model and its parental tumor across most HCMI tumor-model pairs, thus showcasing models’ ability to retain key genetic, transcriptional and epigenetic attributes of their parental tumors. However, our analysis also identified divergent features in a subset (<8%) of models, potentially resulting in a loss of fidelity and challenging their translational use. To identify whether this discordance might be driven by ex vivo adaptations or selective evolutionary pressures from in vitro culture, we profiled a representative subset (n=13 pairs) of glioblastoma (GBM, n=7) and pancreatic cancer (PAAD, n=6) tumor-model pairs using single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq). Analysis of 132,593 nuclei (tumors: 66,054; models: 66,539) identified outlier GBM models undergoing proneural-to-mesenchymal (PTM) transition and highlighted serum culture media as a major associated factor of this process. Additionally, we found that divergences in selected PAAD (72,688 nuclei: tumors: 30,254; models: 42,434) pairs were linked to the complete loss of the rich tumor microenvironment cells in the original tumors and the in vitro expansion of select malignant subpopulations, as identified by network-based analysis of VIPER-inferred protein activity profiles. The observed divergences suggest that in vitro culture conditions can occasionally drive cellular reprogramming and alter phenotypic fidelity, resulting in varying degrees of state-specific transitions. However, the majority of the models (even those classified as outliers) are preserved for state-frequency in cellular subpopulations between tumors and models, and most if not all of the cellular states found in the parental tumor, thus faithfully representing intra-tumor heterogeneity. Taken together, these findings highlight the translational potential of the HCMI model repository and its translational relevance as an invaluable tool to support precision oncology. Citation Format: Dina ElHarouni, Mushriq Al-Jazrawe, Seongmin Choi, Merve Dede, Toshinori Hinoue, Sean A. Misek, Heeju Noh, Luca Zanella, Moony Tseng, Hayley E. Francies, Priya Sridevi, Rachana Agarwal, Cindy W. Kyi, Julyann Perez-Mayoral, Megan J. Stine, Eva Tonsing-Carter, James M. Clinton, The HCMI Network, Peter W. Laird, Calvin J. Kuo, Olivier Elemento, David L. Spector, Andrew D. Cherniack, Kyle Elrott, Martin L. Ferguson, Rameen Beroukhim, Katherine A. Hoadley, Nicolas Robine, Andrew McPherson, Matthew J. Garnett, David A. Tuveson, Andrea Califano, Paul T. Spellman, Keith L. Ligon, Daniela S. Gerhard, Louis M. Staudt, Jesse Boehm. Single cell transcriptional dynamics in the HCMI cancer model collection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 6358.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
Broad Institute (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), American Type Culture Collection (US), Van Andel Institute (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Cornell University (US), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB), Information Management Services (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US), National Cancer Institute (US), ORCID (US), Center for Cancer Research (US), New York Genome Center (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Columbia University (US), Stanford University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.