Abstract 704: Primary versus delayed surgery in fibrolamellar carcinoma

Abstract Background: Fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is a rare, primary liver cancer of young adults without liver disease, distinct from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), usually presenting as advanced stage. FLC has been thought of as a "surgical disease." Because of a lack of data, and a legacy of FLC being mislabeled as “fibrolamellar HCC, ” recommendations have been similar to HCC with upfront surgery considered for all new diagnosis and systemic therapy reserved for those deemed inoperable. Our foundation has assembled the largest collection of FLC cases to date. We reviewed surgery data in FLC stratified by stage and systemic therapy. Methods: We report 216 cases of FLC from our own database and 24 from the medical literature that included: Information about demographics, surgery, systemic therapy, staging, time to relapse and overall survival. We defined “localized” as confined to the liver (AJCC stage 1), “regional” as regional lymph node involvement at surgery (AJCC stage 2 and 3), and “metastatic” (AJCC stage 4) as distant metastasis. Results: Of 155 patients with initial surgery, 44 (28%) had adjuvant systemic therapy and 85 ‘unresectable’ patients had neo-adjuvant therapy converting 31 patients to have delayed surgery (36%). Relapses were nearly universal (89% at 5 years). There was 100% 10-year survival for localized disease, but frequent relapses nonetheless. Adjuvant therapy gave regional patients a survival advantage. Neo-adjuvant therapy benefited metastatic patients as well as providing as significant delay in time to relapse. Benefit to 54 metastatic patients who had neoadjuvant therapy but no surgery was also seen. [Table1] Conclusion: Primary surgery for localized FLC offers excellent long-term control, but regional and metastatic FLC should be considered systemic diseases and systemic therapy before surgery should be considered before committing to initial resection. Neoadjuvant therapy can covert unresectable patients to resectable, and adjuvant therapy appears to benefit all non-localized patients. Citation Format: Paul M. Kent, Tomoaki Kato, Abhinar Humar, Oliver Fisher, Matthew Dixon, Christopher Seder, Tom Stockwell. Primary versus delayed surgery in fibrolamellar carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 704.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-704
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 704: Primary versus delayed surgery in fibrolamellar carcinoma

Tom Stockwell, Matthew Dixon, Oliver M. Fisher, Tomoaki Kato et al.
Cancer Research
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Abstract 704: Primary versus delayed surgery in fibrolamellar carcinoma

Tom Stockwell, Matthew Dixon, Oliver M. Fisher, Tomoaki Kato, Paul Kent, Abhinav Humar, Christopher W. Seder
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is a rare, primary liver cancer of young adults without liver disease, distinct from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), usually presenting as advanced stage. FLC has been thought of as a "surgical disease." Because of a lack of data, and a legacy of FLC being mislabeled as “fibrolamellar HCC, ” recommendations have been similar to HCC with upfront surgery considered for all new diagnosis and systemic therapy reserved for those deemed inoperable. Our foundation has assembled the largest collection of FLC cases to date. We reviewed surgery data in FLC stratified by stage and systemic therapy. Methods: We report 216 cases of FLC from our own database and 24 from the medical literature that included: Information about demographics, surgery, systemic therapy, staging, time to relapse and overall survival. We defined “localized” as confined to the liver (AJCC stage 1), “regional” as regional lymph node involvement at surgery (AJCC stage 2 and 3), and “metastatic” (AJCC stage 4) as distant metastasis. Results: Of 155 patients with initial surgery, 44 (28%) had adjuvant systemic therapy and 85 ‘unresectable’ patients had neo-adjuvant therapy converting 31 patients to have delayed surgery (36%). Relapses were nearly universal (89% at 5 years). There was 100% 10-year survival for localized disease, but frequent relapses nonetheless. Adjuvant therapy gave regional patients a survival advantage. Neo-adjuvant therapy benefited metastatic patients as well as providing as significant delay in time to relapse. Benefit to 54 metastatic patients who had neoadjuvant therapy but no surgery was also seen. [Table1] Conclusion: Primary surgery for localized FLC offers excellent long-term control, but regional and metastatic FLC should be considered systemic diseases and systemic therapy before surgery should be considered before committing to initial resection. Neoadjuvant therapy can covert unresectable patients to resectable, and adjuvant therapy appears to benefit all non-localized patients. Citation Format: Paul M. Kent, Tomoaki Kato, Abhinar Humar, Oliver Fisher, Matthew Dixon, Christopher Seder, Tom Stockwell. Primary versus delayed surgery in fibrolamellar carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 704.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
Rush University Medical Center (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), St George Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.