Assessment of primary stability of glenoid bone block procedures used for patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability - a biomechanical study in a synthetic bone model

Anterior glenoid reconstruction using bone blocks is increasingly recognised as treatment option after critical bone loss. In this study, a biomechanical test setup is used to assess micromotion after bone block augmentation at the glenoid, comparing bone block augmentation with a spina-scapula block to the standard coracoid bone block (Latarjet). Twenty-four synthetic shoulder specimens were tested. Two surgical techniques (coracoid and spina-scapula bone block augmentation) were used on two different types of synthetic bone (Synbone and Sawbone). The specimens were cyclically loaded according to the 'rocking horse' setup defined in ASTM F2028. A mediolateral force of 170 N was applied on the bone block and a complete test comprised 5000 cycles. The Micromotion between bone block and glenoid was measured using a 3D Digital Image Correlation system. The measured micromotion divided into irreversible and reversible displacement of the augmented block. Medial irreversible displacement was the dominant component of the micromotion. The spina-scapula bone block showed a significantly higher irreversible displacement in medial direction compared to the coracoid block, when aggregating both types of synthetic bone (spina: 1.00 ± 0.39 mm, coracoid: 0.56 ± 0.39 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.01). The dominant irreversible medial displacement can be interpreted as initial settling behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2025.2492127
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of primary stability of glenoid bone block procedures used for patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability - a biomechanical study in a synthetic bone model

Stefan Schleifenbaum, Jean-Pierre Fischer, Peter Melcher, Martin Heilemann et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
2.01
article

Assessment of primary stability of glenoid bone block procedures used for patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability - a biomechanical study in a synthetic bone model

Stefan Schleifenbaum, Jean-Pierre Fischer, Peter Melcher, Martin Heilemann, Yasmin Youssef, Pierre Hepp, Jan Theopold
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Anterior glenoid reconstruction using bone blocks is increasingly recognised as treatment option after critical bone loss. In this study, a biomechanical test setup is used to assess micromotion after bone block augmentation at the glenoid, comparing bone block augmentation with a spina-scapula block to the standard coracoid bone block (Latarjet). Twenty-four synthetic shoulder specimens were tested. Two surgical techniques (coracoid and spina-scapula bone block augmentation) were used on two different types of synthetic bone (Synbone and Sawbone). The specimens were cyclically loaded according to the 'rocking horse' setup defined in ASTM F2028. A mediolateral force of 170 N was applied on the bone block and a complete test comprised 5000 cycles. The Micromotion between bone block and glenoid was measured using a 3D Digital Image Correlation system. The measured micromotion divided into irreversible and reversible displacement of the augmented block. Medial irreversible displacement was the dominant component of the micromotion. The spina-scapula bone block showed a significantly higher irreversible displacement in medial direction compared to the coracoid block, when aggregating both types of synthetic bone (spina: 1.00 ± 0.39 mm, coracoid: 0.56 ± 0.39 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.01). The dominant irreversible medial displacement can be interpreted as initial settling behaviour.

Journal of Medical Engineering & TechnologyVol. 49(4)
Leipzig University (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.