Responsible Leadership: Strategic Versus Integrative Practices in Complex System Transformation
Systems of national importance like national health care systems, even if historically and culturally diverse, are today facing similar problems. One way to address them is through responsible leadership orientations and practices that promote complex problem solving and multiple stakeholder relations. Here, we focus on challenges facing leaders in two historically distinct public health care systems, that of the UK (NHS) and the Republic of Slovenia (JZS), in terms of (a) costs versus care; (b) navigating regulations and bureaucracy; and (c) meeting the needs of staff versus patients. Then, we compare how responsible leadership, expressed in the form of the strategist versus integrator orientation of leader, could help to mitigate these problems. Analysing these two forms of responsible leadership, which successively express more mental maturity and practical acumen, illustrates their relative strengths in reconciling multiple economic and social interests, operational challenges, and public concerns in different national health system contexts. This highlights responsible leadership as a means to inform policy making and practice in public health care systems and opens up a vital discussion on the importance of leadership to ensure the human right to a healthy and fulfilling life.
Authors
- Philip H. Mirvis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0009-3609)
- Katja Hleb
- Tomaž Schara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7282-3888)
Institutions
- University of Ljubljana (SI)
- IEDC-Bled School of Management (SI)
- Babson College (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Administrative Sciences
- Published
- 2025-04-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15040145
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.32