Perceived vs. actual multitasking abilities: Predicting texting while driving efficacy and behavior from overconfidence

Whereas numerous studies have reported drivers' overconfidence in their driving ability, this study examines overconfidence in one's multitasking abilities operationalized as overestimation (perception relative to one's actual performance) and overplacement (perception relative to others' abilities) as predictors of texting while driving (TWD). This study also examines TWD self-efficacy as an explanatory mechanism for the relationship between overconfidence and TWD. A sample of 611 undergraduate students (34 % male, mean age of 19.52 years) from a southwestern US university completed an online task-switching paradigm to assess their multitasking ability and multiple self-report measures of TWD-related constructs. TWD was also measured using phone application data. Results indicated that overconfidence (both overestimation and overplacement) was more strongly related to TWD self-efficacy than self-efficacy to resist TWD. TWD self-efficacy explained the relationships between overconfidence and TWD. Additionally, TWD self-efficacy predicted self-reported and actual TWD above and beyond self-efficacy to resist TWD and vice versa. Actual multitasking ability was not significantly related to actual or self-reported TWD. Overall, these findings provide evidence for the influence of overconfidence in multitasking and two forms of self-efficacy on TWD. Implications as well as future directions for research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2025.108058
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived vs. actual multitasking abilities: Predicting texting while driving efficacy and behavior from overconfidence

Stephanie C. Payne, Benjamin D. Schulte, Claire E. Bowman-Callaway
1 citations
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
article

Perceived vs. actual multitasking abilities: Predicting texting while driving efficacy and behavior from overconfidence

Stephanie C. Payne, Benjamin D. Schulte, Claire E. Bowman-Callaway
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Whereas numerous studies have reported drivers' overconfidence in their driving ability, this study examines overconfidence in one's multitasking abilities operationalized as overestimation (perception relative to one's actual performance) and overplacement (perception relative to others' abilities) as predictors of texting while driving (TWD). This study also examines TWD self-efficacy as an explanatory mechanism for the relationship between overconfidence and TWD. A sample of 611 undergraduate students (34 % male, mean age of 19.52 years) from a southwestern US university completed an online task-switching paradigm to assess their multitasking ability and multiple self-report measures of TWD-related constructs. TWD was also measured using phone application data. Results indicated that overconfidence (both overestimation and overplacement) was more strongly related to TWD self-efficacy than self-efficacy to resist TWD. TWD self-efficacy explained the relationships between overconfidence and TWD. Additionally, TWD self-efficacy predicted self-reported and actual TWD above and beyond self-efficacy to resist TWD and vice versa. Actual multitasking ability was not significantly related to actual or self-reported TWD. Overall, these findings provide evidence for the influence of overconfidence in multitasking and two forms of self-efficacy on TWD. Implications as well as future directions for research are discussed.

Accident Analysis & PreventionVol. 217
Texas A&M University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.